Thinings value

[codlasher]

I'm in total agreement with TCD here. If you can't/won't do the job correctly in the first place please walk away from it! You'll fcuk it up for everyone else in the future if you start pi**ing around in any other way. Modern forestry methods have evolved to fell, extract & leave the site in a fit state for the next time whilst breaking even, or if you do it properly make a profit for both parties. Now I'm looking at this from a land-owners side but I'm also a huge supporter of professional competent forestry operations.

Good pics by the way although I hate chain saw sided up lower stems......I used to go out with my Silky for days doing this job simlpy because it was a better way to do it.

codlasher

Edited April 1, 2017 by codlasher
Spelling, as usual!

[drinksloe]

If it was just done the right and proven way in the first place all these crazy, labour and machinery intensive ideas would be completely unnecessary.

 

Some people got time and money to burn.

 

 

 

Ur right but sometimes even with all the gear u have to resort to that sort of stuff.

Usually ground to steep or wet. And it is a PITA

 

I spent 1 very unpleasant day scrambling up and down a sheer face with a wire rope pulling already proccessed logs down (harvester got up but no way could the forwarder follow) Wouldn't have been so bad if trees were converted

 

If its just for amenity value.

The onwer might actually be cheaper just cutting the timber to waste and leave it there as extraction could very easily be a PITA.

The litte he gains in timber value is offset by labour saving?

[axehaircut]

Rack it

Curve in the top and bottom of the lines, looks great. Reduces wind tunnels.

Once it's second thinned using the rack system it'll look very pleasing.

Funnily in the long term aesthetics of Sitka etc it's more a question of the neatness of the work. Little tricks of turning in the lines will help the owners feeling towards the job. Also racks then mean you don't hack the monkeys out of what's left at 2nd thin. Once neatly done and brash is handled correctly it will look great. I presume there's no mounding drains. I'm sure some of the other guys have photos of very neat jobs at 2nd thinned state to show you and the owners of what can be achieved with rack system. It can and will look natural down the line. Everything in forestry takes time.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Arbtalk

[Mambus]

If they are after a continuous cover system (never clear felling) you're just helping with a means to that end. You need to persuade them that it's not really important what the crop looks like at this stage.. You're just getting it on its way in the most practical way you can, like many of the boys here have already referred to.

They're not even 1/3 of the way through the project. Good luck.

 

 

Sent from my iPad using Arbtalk

[oldwoodcutter]

The sweat is running down my back just thinking about you doing that lot that way.

[hplp]

Im sorry, but Id be another saying rack thin it, with a selective thin between the racks. Then you can skidd/forward it out quickly with the least damage to the remaining crop.

 

Once at roadside you can then decide to either sell it whole tree for chipping or cut products out of it.

 

Id be suggesting either a 360 or a small harvester.

 

With doing a entirely matrix thin you will damage the remaining crop badly from all the knocks and scrapes.

 

H

[drinksloe]

I may be wrong here but i sort of get the impression that the owner puts no commercial value on the wood so it doesn't need to be 2nd thinned or even ever felled and is just wanting some more light in about it for looks/conservation.

 

Obviously it may impact on future price if he ever sold the wood if not done by a more normal method, but i bet a lot of folk buy woods without ever looking at them anyway

[Stubby]

So , is it a " wood " or a commercial " matrix " plantation ?

[Andymacp]

I may be wrong here but i sort of get the impression that the owner puts no commercial value on the wood so it doesn't need to be 2nd thinned or even ever felled and is just wanting some more light in about it for looks/conservation.

 

Obviously it may impact on future price if he ever sold the wood if not done by a more normal method, but i bet a lot of folk buy woods without ever looking at them anyway

 

 

 

 

Spot on, not a commercial wood.

[axehaircut]

The op question was whether the timber had commercial value.

The owner wants CFC. There is a better long term chance of this by racking it and selective irregular thinning there after. Only trying to be helpful but if you go ahead with your original plan I'd be very curious to see how you get on with it.

 

 

Sent from my iPhone using Arbtalk