Potus ???

[Stubby]

3 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Every time you post this sort of shite it reinforces my opinion that a university education isn’t for everyone. “ have a soft cock for Blair” 😂😂😂😂😂

Yea but he has a hedge cutter !

[GarethM]

3 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Every time you post this sort of shite it reinforces my opinion that a university education isn’t for everyone. “ have a soft cock for Blair” 😂😂😂😂😂

It's a turn of phrase that makes you wonder.

 

Maybe a soft cock is praise for the almost physical vomit inducing wretching at the thought of the war criminal, versus the obvious hard-on some have for Blair and Starmer ?

[Mark J]

3 minutes ago, Stubby said:

Yea but he has a hedge cutter !

I haven't got a hedge!

[Stubby]

3 minutes ago, Mark J said:

I haven't got a hedge!

Sorry . Wrong person . 🙂

[Mark J]

3 minutes ago, Stubby said:

Sorry . Wrong person . 🙂

Just kidding, I do actually have a hedge cutter. 

 

[tree-fancier123]

44 minutes ago, GarethM said:

Right, so tell us why they need highly enriched uranium for a peaceful reactor programme?.

 

they don't - obviously they want nuclear weapons - their arch enemy Israel has loads, an undocumented amount.

The interesting question for me is - if Iran were to make a hundred and there is a 10% chance of them getting through air defences, then Iran could destroy Israel, or at least level the major cities. Now, that is not disputed, but I often wonder would Iran really do it, because Israel and probably US too, would then visit upon Iran a nuclear holocaust. I suppose all the fuss is because people think Iran are mad enough to not worry about mutually assured destruction. Also Iran is big geographically, so would require a lot of nukes to be sure of a good kill

[Mark J]

8 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

Every time you post this sort of shite it reinforces my opinion that a university education isn’t for everyone. “ have a soft cock for Blair” 😂😂😂😂😂

What I was insinuating is that you have fat one for pointing out how shite the Gulf war and Blair was, I'm wondering if you'll have the same enthusiasm to detract from what's going on now in the middle east. 
You keep going on about university education, I think you'd probably manage with a bit of support. 

 

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, Steven P said:

 

 

 

Tool and fckwit. Edited at 2:15 in the morning I reckon. Last online at 4:00 on a Sunday morning.

 

Does it lie awake at night tossing and turning because it has missed an opportunity to have a dig, perhaps it sleeps on the couch these days, D'Senior Dating, and is awake anyway? Perhaps it has lost all sense of irony, or is it a shame thing for a man from Blyth who doesn't know where coal comes from? I don't know, anyone else know?

 

 

SP any chance you can tidy up those loose ends any time soon. 
Just so you stop making a total fool of yourself I’ll help you out here you retard. I’m working in St Vincent there’s a 5 hr time difference to the UK, you do understand or grasp the fact it’s not the same time all over the world I presume !! . I’ve mentioned this already as well as the fact I’m not from and have never lived in Blyth, do you have learning difficulties ?  😂😂

[GarethM]

6 minutes ago, tree-fancier123 said:

they don't - obviously they want nuclear weapons - their arch enemy Israel has loads, an undocumented amount.

The interesting question for me is - if Iran were to make a hundred and there is a 10% chance of them getting through air defences, then Iran could destroy Israel, or at least level the major cities. Now, that is not disputed, but I often wonder would Iran really do it, because Israel and probably US too, would then visit upon Iran a nuclear holocaust. I suppose all the fuss is because people think Iran are mad enough to not worry about mutually assured destruction. Also Iran is big geographically, so would require a lot of nukes to be sure of a good kill

Right, let's use your logical conclusion.

 

100 are fired, what happens to those that don't go bang or are intercepted, well you've highly radioactive bits raining down.

 

So radioactive it'll make the area much worse than Chernobyl, do you want to take that chance ?.

 

As reactor fuel, up until it's put in a reactor isnt much more dangerous radioactively speaking than background, unless you want to turn a whole country into a wasteland ?.

[Johnsond]

15 minutes ago, Mark J said:

What I was insinuating is that you have fat one for pointing out how shite the Gulf war and Blair was, I'm wondering if you'll have the same enthusiasm to detract from what's going on now in the middle east. 
You keep going on about university education, I think you'd probably manage with a bit of support. 

 

Graduate income 🤔no thanks I’m ok with the path I followed Mark 👍