Potus ???

[Johnsond]

On 27/01/2025 at 19:18, Youngstu said:

 

If the cap fits...

Just in case you weren't sure, a simple google gives this definition:

 

bigotry

/ˈbɪɡətri/

 

noun

noun: bigotry; plural noun: bigotries

1. obstinate or unreasonable attachment to a belief, opinion, or faction, in particular prejudice against a person or people on the basis of their membership of a particular group.

   "the difficulties of combating prejudice and bigotry"

   h

   Similar:

   prejudice

    

   bias

    

   partiality

    

   partisanship

    

   sectarianism

    

   chauvinism

    

   discrimination

    

   unfairness

    

   injustice

    

   intolerance

    

   narrow-mindedness

   fanaticism

    

   dogmatism

    

   racism

    

   racialism

    

   sexism

    

   homophobia

    

   h

   Opposite:

   tolerance

    

    

How’s about this freak YS how do you swing this as normal 🤷‍♂️😂😂😂

[GarethM]

34 minutes ago, Johnsond said:

How’s about this freak YS how do you swing this as normal 🤷‍♂️😂😂😂

So if it/he/she meets a mirror image and starts cheating with it/she/he that's going to be one very messy divorce getting 50% of everything.

 

Did you consummate the marriage, yes but it/he also slept with the bridesmaid/bestman whatever.

Edited January 30 by GarethM

[Stubby]

1 minute ago, GarethM said:

So if it/he/she meets a mirror image and starts cheating with it/she/he that's going to be one very messy divorce getting 50% of everything.

Who would be the beneficiary in the will ? 

[GarethM]

7 minutes ago, Stubby said:

Who would be the beneficiary in the will ? 

Try arguing spouse tax relief

[Steven P]

... but there is also 66 million other French people, and you are getting worked up over an end of the news report story of 1 person? Perhaps time to get a reality check?

 

- No harm caused to me

- No harm caused to you

- ... or anyone

- So what's the problem?

[GarethM]

2 minutes ago, Steven P said:

... but there is also 66 million other French people, and you are getting worked up over an end of the news report story of 1 person? Perhaps time to get a reality check?

 

- No harm caused to me

- No harm caused to you

- ... or anyone

- So what's the problem?

I'm sure when you're down the pub it's a full collection of extreme BDSM wear because it's harming nobody.

[Johnsond]

😂

[GarethM]

Just now, Johnsond said:

😂

I did not have sexual relations with that women, sir that's your wife.

 

Wtf else did you think I was talking about!.

[Steven P]

35 minutes ago, GarethM said:

I'm sure when you're down the pub it's a full collection of extreme BDSM wear because it's harming nobody.

 

That's my point. It's not. It is such a tiny - tiny portion of people that space it is taking in your head is well out of proportion. And harming no one at that too,

[GarethM]

11 minutes ago, Steven P said:

 

That's my point. It's not. It is such a tiny - tiny portion of people that space it is taking in your head is well out of proportion. And harming no one at that too,

I'm sure that sarcasm just flew right over your perfectly quaffed blue hair.

 

It's called common decency, you don't walk around in BDSM gear or go to the supermarket wearing your tighty whities like a pedeo down the lido.

 

At home/nudist colony or those weird sex fetishism clubs you frequent, that's fine.

 

Maybe they lacked a few slaps as a child, but it's that upbringing that means a shave in the morning and at the very least not smelling like a hobo.