Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Next POTUS?  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. Next POTUS?

    • Hillary Clinton
      21
    • Donald Trump
      29


Recommended Posts

Posted
2 hours ago, GarethM said:

Soliciting isn't rape is it,

I believe that in the USA it is, a minor cannot give consent to any sex act as they are under the legal age of consent, so it comes under the umbrella terms of which the US has many but they mean rape, whether they want sex with the adult, are forced,  procured etc etc 

  • Like 1

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
1 hour ago, tree-fancier123 said:

If these young women were 16 or 17 at the time it is not really any different to Burlusconi and Ruby The Heart Stealer.  

Child sex offender - seems shagging anyone under 18 in the states is enough to earn that label

 

They were as young as 12 - Haven't had time to dig out the reports yet.

Posted
1 hour ago, GarethM said:

No, soliciting is giving them money for favours.

 

Paying for something you don't do isn't rape, that why the crime has a different title.

 

Rape is a physical act, bit like Bill in the oval office with a cigar tube, he didn't but instructed her.

 

That is what he was convicted off.

 

But you seam to think that a 40+ year old offering a 14 year old money for sex is OK.

 

For information, he continued and raped the girl, but wasn't prosecuted on that part - did you see on the news at all, Epstein did a plea deal? That was the deal, he would fess up the soliciting, they would drop the rape bit. Deal involved Trumps attorney general if you want a term of reference to the current thread.

 

 

Not acceptable here by the way. Never was, never will be.

Not acceptable in any town I have lived in either.

 

Why is it acceptable to you?

Posted
6 minutes ago, tree-fancier123 said:

It's like Taxi Driver starring Steven P as Travis, blows the pedo guy away, cool as a cucumber

Problem is sp wouldn't know which to f it or suck it 

  • Haha 2
Posted

I’m starting to wonder if an obsessed  anonymous member who is that embarrassed by his position in life he won’t even say how he makes a living, even realises  the object of his rape fantasies is actually dead. 

  • Like 1
Posted
7 hours ago, Steven P said:

From the Independant:

 

WWW.INDEPENDENT.CO.UK

Convicted sex offender ‘kept a computerised database of women and girls’

 

after you posted that I (allegations after Epstein's death) - I read some of his Wikipedia page

1. Yes the girls were younger than I thought, as young as 14 in the indictment he was in jail for

2 various reports of surveillance camera systems in toilets and bedrooms of some of his properties - made me think he may have had tapes of associates with girls/women kept as 'insurance'

3 mulitiple sources say the tape of the communal area outside his cell has a minute or more missing - so powerful people may have had him killed, made to look like suicide (not probably Trump btw!, although it would have been bad for Trump he could at least have pardoned himself as was still Potus) the post mortem found broken bones sometimes associated with hanging, but more frequently strangulation

4 gory details about the sex in the indictment - most of the time Epstein got them to undress fully or partially, then jerked himself off, and touched and groped them while they gave him a massage, afterwards paying them hundreds of dollars each time - of course it's bad to do it with 14 year olds, but the wiki detailed several older girls who went to the island 18 year olds, some were really beautiful.

5 If you've got money women is probably the best thing to spend it on - keep it bang on 18 and above to avoid problems - even though Henry 8th got away with marrying Katherine Howard when she was 16

  • Like 1
Posted
2 hours ago, tree-fancier123 said:

made me think he may have had tapes of associates with girls/women kept as 'insurance'

So why weren't they found? The many images of children and women were.

 

2 hours ago, tree-fancier123 said:

so powerful people may have had him killed

Again what evidence is there?

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.