Potus ???

[GarethM]

9 minutes ago, Mark J said:

And, that proves what exactly oh publicity.

 

Starmer was incharge of prosecutions around the time saville was publicly known for the diddly fiddling and chose not to investigate or even charge, plus all grooming gangs.

 

Back in the height of his fame, there were rumours but he practically walked on water.

 

Compare the legal treatment of saville to for example Fred the weatherman/Rolf Harris, makes you wonder why the difference.

 

Maybe saville knew more about Starmer than we even want to know!.

[Mark J]

8 minutes ago, GarethM said:

And, that proves what exactly oh publicity.

 

Starmer was incharge of prosecutions around the time saville was publicly known for the diddly fiddling and chose not to investigate or even charge, plus all grooming gangs.

 

Back in the height of his fame, there were rumours but he practically walked on water.

 

Compare the legal treatment of saville to for example Fred the weatherman/Rolf Harris, makes you wonder why the difference.

 

Maybe saville knew more about Starmer than we even want to know!.

Do you really think that the folk who ran/run security for the royals and thatcher weren't aware of saville's noncery? If they didn't they were incompetent, which is worrying. If they did they are complicit, which is also worrying.

What do you think happened there?
 

[Mick Dempsey]

3 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Do you really think that the folk who ran/run security for the royals and thatcher weren't aware of saville's noncery? If they didn't they were incompetent, which is worrying. If they did they are complicit, which is also worrying.

What do you think happened there?
 

He hid in plain sight. 

[GarethM]

Exactly plain sight, exactly the same with Garry of the gitter.

 

Shall we just imagine one of today's stars being accused, what about your sainted Gary lineker or the bicycle lover vine!.

 

Basically it won't happen until you've fallen a few pegs down to a level where hordes of fans aren't going to riot, like Brand now the luvvies have abandoned him post BBC and C4.

[Stubby]

4 minutes ago, GarethM said:

Exactly plain sight, exactly the same with Garry of the gitter.

 

Shall we just imagine one of today's stars being accused, what about your sainted Gary lineker or the bicycle lover vine!.

 

Basically it won't happen until you've fallen a few pegs down to a level where hordes of fans aren't going to riot, like Brand now the luvvies have abandoned him post BBC and C4.

I was so disappointed when Stuart Hall turned out to be a nonce . I used to laugh my cock off at  Its a Knock Out .  

[GarethM]

3 minutes ago, Stubby said:

I was so disappointed when Stuart Hall turned out to be a nonce . I used to laugh my cock off at  Its a Knock Out .  

Yeah, was a bit of an odd one that.

 

But in fairness, most of the "stars" were doing the same thing around the 60/70s, even Elvis and a 14 year old.

 

Not condoning any of the shenanigans, even the music legend of John Peel has a tarnished reputation.

 

He was diddled at boarding school from what I also remember.

[Steven P]

36 minutes ago, GarethM said:

Starmer was incharge of prosecutions around the time saville was publicly known for the diddly fiddling and chose not to investigate or even charge

 

Though you will dispute this, Savilles case never got to the desk of Starmer for him to make a decision on it, the fault lies further down the chain with collection and presenting evidence to the CPS, and (not a fault) a reluctance of victims to come forward to help make that case believing - as is often the case - that they are the only ones, won't be believed.

 

CPS doesn't dictate what is investigated of course.

[Oldfeller]

It doesn't matter how much feckin' cream you put on sh1t,, it's still sh1t

[Mick Dempsey]

30 minutes ago, GarethM said:

Exactly plain sight, exactly the same with Garry of the gitter.

 

Shall we just imagine one of today's stars being accused, what about your sainted Gary lineker or the bicycle lover vine!.

 

 

Joey Barton lost a few quid accusing JV of noncery. 
 

Twats like you making completely unfounded accusations just cos you don’t like someone is one of the reasons the guilty ones escape proper investigations. 
 

[GarethM]

7 minutes ago, Mick Dempsey said:

Joey Barton lost a few quid accusing JV of noncery. 
 

Twats like you making completely unfounded accusations just cos you don’t like someone is one of the reasons the guilty ones escape proper investigations. 

WTF are you on about, I used the words imagine FFS.

 

And why not read the full post for a little context of the argument!.

 

It's reactionary Muppets like you that cause half the problems, whilst no doubt shouting silence is violence or words matter, yeah only when it suits your particular narrative.

 

Whilst I respect your freedom of speech, it also equally gives me the right to say, don't be a Muppet.

Edited June 4 by GarethM