Potus ???

[Johnsond]

2 hours ago, Mesterh said:

You sound really upset.

So Im a communist for saying that trump is dancing to the tune of musk am I   I run a business and employee staff, im probably more of a capitalist than a communist!

 

"Javier and Donald are what capitalism is about, you have a state that's going to be kept in check but also does what we expect them to do at a reasonable price."

 

Really, well we will soon find out wont we. 

 

 

 

I must be a right insensitive bugger, SP unbelievably picks up anger from a factual statement, somehow you detect emotions in the post you quoted 🤷‍♂️🤔. I’m obviously not picking up the vibes. 
Maybe the Mrs is right after all either that or I prefer straight talking. 

[Steven P]

Maybe you should get an early night one day. Or get me out of your head.

[Johnsond]

53 minutes ago, Steven P said:

Maybe you should get an early night one day. Or get me out of your head.

I was up late after picking up my son as a favour who was at a mates watching the boxing. Rural living SP and being a father 🤷‍♂️

Don’t concern yourself with my sleep patterns or personal life you sad deluded clown.  

[Steven P]

Ooooh, tetchy this morning arn't you... perhaps you should have had a lie in. Tended to do that with the little ones when they were grumpy, put them down for a nap and they get up in a far better mood.

 

 

However, if I was to give advice that would be listened to... what did your post last night actually bring to the discussion? Any insights into the POTUS thread... the way I read it it was just cheap digs... perhaps there is a place where you say it best, when you say nothing at all. When you do say, it is generally nothing to do with the thread at all, just cheap trying to get a verbal one up-manship over -anyone- really. And when that doesn't work, we all become (checking the latast insults) "sad deluded clowns"

 

So as I might have mentioned before, bring something worthwhile to the discussion. Very few (errr.... none) other embers to the forum spend anywhere like your 90% of posts trying to spew forth insults and verbals. Try a different tact and you might find people will engage positively with you.

Edited Sunday at 12:19 by Steven P

[Johnsond]

1 hour ago, Steven P said:

Ooooh, tetchy this morning arn't you... perhaps you should have had a lie in. Tended to do that with the little ones when they were grumpy, put them down for a nap and they get up in a far better mood.

 

 

However, if I was to give advice that would be listened to... what did your post last night actually bring to the discussion? Any insights into the POTUS thread... the way I read it it was just cheap digs... perhaps there is a place where you say it best, when you say nothing at all. When you do say, it is generally nothing to do with the thread at all, just cheap trying to get a verbal one up-manship over -anyone- really. And when that doesn't work, we all become (checking the latast insults) "sad deluded clowns"

 

So as I might have mentioned before, bring something worthwhile to the discussion. Very few (errr.... none) other embers to the forum spend anywhere like your 90% of posts trying to spew forth insults and verbals. Try a different tact and you might find people will engage positively with you.

Not tetchy that’s just you assuming yet again for the umpteenth time. . What I don’t appreciate is some anonymous internet wanker taking an unhealthy Interest and commenting on my personal life. 
Politely F…k off SP

[Steven P]

Whatever.

 

(think whatever is said about your personal life is said by you, not by any one else)

 

 

 

 

Anyway, anyone fancy going back to Biden or the Trump-Musk marriage?

 

[Johnsond]

46 minutes ago, Steven P said:

Whatever.

 

(think whatever is said about your personal life is said by you, not by any one else)

 

 

 

 

Anyway, anyone fancy going back to Biden or the Trump-Musk marriage?

 

Politely F..k off SP, take the hint. 

[Stubby]

4 hours ago, Steven P said:

 Try a different tact and you might find people will engage positively with you.

Just to be pedantic ( bringing nothing to the debate ) its " tack " not tact . As in sailing on a different tack . 🙂

[Mick Dempsey]

Or maybe he’s mixing tack, tact and tactic.

[Steven P]

No stubby had it. Grrr for all the others out there as pedantic as me!