Jump to content
  • David Humphries
    David Humphries

    Interpreting Tree Decay

    Can early stage decay caused by Kretzschmaria deusta be detected & differentiated from other types of decay using a micro-drill?

     

    David Humphries and  Alasdair Nicoll                          

    City of London Corporation Arborists – Hampstead Heath, North London Open Spaces

     

     

    There have been suggestions that some decay detection equipment like the Resistograph® may struggle to detect the early stages of decay caused by fungi species like Kretzschmaria deusta, which are known to exhibit a soft rot mode of decay, 1 sometimes referred to as a ‘facilitative rot’ mode, meaning it’s establishing conditions for the progress of decay. We decided to test this theory by comparing a cross-section of a failed lime tree against micro-drill readings taken from different points around the circumference through sound, dysfunctional and decayed wood.

     

    For the tests described in this article we have used the IML Resistograph® PD400.  It is a micro drill used for tree & utility pole inspection that tests for resistance through a given wood volume. A consistent force is applied and measured. As the probe penetrates the volume the difference between denser and less dense wood is measured which then indicates wood condition.

     

     

    The Resistograph® PD series has the option of 5 needle speed settings that govern rpm & rate of feed. Different speed enables the probe to pass through differing densities of the wood volume. It is worth considering that amplitude (height of the reading) can be read higher up the Y axis based upon the speed setting of the needle. Amplitude is not a literal reading of the wood quality it is simply a change in resistance and should not be taken as a signature for any specific decay species and/or type.

     

    Main types of decay 

     

    Soft rot/facilitative rot Wood initially becomes brittle due to cellulose degradation. This often results in ceramic brittle fracture of affected parts, should they fail.             

    Example: Kretzschmaria deusta 2


    Brown rot – This rot type primarily degrades cellulose and hemicellulose, leaving the lignin intact. Wood shrinks noticeably in volume, sometimes cracking, becomes lighter and more prone to fracture across the wood grain.    

    Example:  Laetiporus sulphureus 2

     

    White rot – This type of rot can degrade all three major constituents of wood: cellulose, hemicellulose & lignin. Two different types of white rot are commonly reported:                                     

     

    Simultaneous white rot – all three constituents are broken down at similar rates.                                                               

    E.g. Fomes fomentarius 2

                                                                                                                                   

    Selective white rot – lignin & hemicellulose are broken down initially, leaving cellulose relatively unaffected. Wood becomes soft, lighter in weight and colour and often much more stringy/fibrous. E.g. Ganoderma sp 2

     

    in this article we look predominantly at a test case involving early and late stage decay caused by K. deusta within the same tree & how they can be identified across a set of Resistograph® readings.

     

    Context                                                                                                                                                                  

    During zonal inspection in 2012 fruit bodies of K.deusta were first noted on a mature common lime tree (Tilia x europaea) growing beside a well used pedestrian avenue in north London.

    The canopy was reduced to balance the weight of tree away from the footpath at that time. Cracks were then identified on the trees buttresses on the path side during the winter of 2015.

     

    The following observations outlined in this article have been produced in the field testing only a narrow range of specimens and not under laboratory conditions, measurements are approximate. The Resistograph® readings are consistent with examples taken on other cross sections and standing trees.

     

    Observations of decay

    After the failure of the subject tree we had the opportunity to test a decayed section of the tree by taking a 4cm thick cross section of the lower stem and buttresses.

    Readings were taken by drilling through five locations using the IML Resistograph® PD400 to observe the mechanical differences across  between intact (sound) wood, early stage decay (including

    reaction zone) and late stage decay that had the consistency of a severe white rot. In our opinion this may be late stage K.deusta decay or a separate white rot species.

     

    IMG_7661.thumb.JPG.b887d733b98aa5bb902d94ca5c6c7b51.JPGIMG_7674.thumb.JPG.01e2f9fb934cb0617e38b9d31b27df32.JPG

    Figures 1 and 2 above; The lime, showing separation cracks at ground level and fruiting bodies of K. deusta

     

    IMG_7695.thumb.JPG.cb21351881f2244fe30e2f616687d008.JPG  IMG_7745.thumb.JPG.620b0aff2a2ced8f9ed1217d4048535b.JPG

    Figures 1 and 2 above; Post failure images showing where the lower buttresses have fractured.

     

    IMG_7757.thumb.JPG.0e99d344fa37dda472196ace70b5f674.JPG  IMG_7755.thumb.JPG.4581391bf0ef339660970960e1e6a2c5.JPG

    Figures 5 and 6 above; A 4cm thick cross section of the lower stem and buttresses.

     

    Test A                                                                                                                                                                             

    40 cm Resistograph® reading (to be read from right to left) from the outer bark through the early stage decay caused by K. deusta  in the sap wood then in to the late stage decay in the centre of the section  and then back into early stage decay. (Graph 1 to be read from right to left)

    Interpretation                                                                                                                                                                              

    The Test A reading (Graph 1) first shows 3 cm of bark followed by irregular rising peaks and troughs as the drill passed through the early stage decay between approximately 3 & 23.5 cm. This can be seen accentuated by the higher green reading (needle speed torque resistance)

    There is then a significant drop off in the reading from 23.5 cm where the needle penetrates the late stage decay for another 14 cm and then continues into the early stage decay for the last 3 cm of the reading & can be seen as a rise in the graph.

     

    Both resistances, torque (green) and penetrating (blue) can be seen as higher across the graph within the early stage decay zone than it can in the late stage decay area due to there being increased resistance to the drill.

    IMG_7763.thumb.JPG.3513361ea77a3032ef3874e0e69be9e5.JPG 59b158fd4a406_Kretzschtest1.thumb.jpg.8037d8816e4e4406a651286c208c0f25.jpg

     

    Figure 7 above; The path of test A.                                                                                              

    Graph 1: Test A reading.

     

    Test B                                                                                                                                                                          

    A 40 cm reading was taken as a control drilling through an intact part of the cross section which is functional wood (Figure 8 and Graph 2)

     

    Interpretation                                                                                                                                                                         

    This test was taken to provide a ‘normal’ reading where there was no decay in the cross section. The green & blue readings show a consistent resistance to penetration (blue) and consistent slight increase in resistance to torque (green) due to frictional drag along the drill bit.                                                 

     (The drop off at the end is due to the needle exiting the cross section underneath)

     

    IMG_7765.thumb.JPG.051055ccb2834291d32ef276fccf83b7.JPG  59b158fb1aba9_Kretschtest2.thumb.jpg.bdf595e2afb9b9ca2c85260f558378fa.jpg

     

    Figure 8: The path of Test B                                                                                                                    

    Graph 2: Test B reading

     

    Test C                                                                                                                                                                                

    A 40 cm Resistograph® reading taken drilling through outer functional sapwood, then through the early stage decay & in to late stage decay.

     

    Interpretation                                                                                                                                                                             

    Test C is a combination between tests A & B, as it shows both intact functional wood between 1-13 cm, early stage/dysfunction between 13 – 26 cm & late stage decay from 26 cm. The peak at 37 cm is a pocket of significantly denser wood within the more decayed part of the section.

     

    IMG_7767.thumb.JPG.3378a552153a806fda69a2b22b8b3704.JPG59b158ff9173a_Kretzschtest3.thumb.jpg.3b6383f3909d8b89285d68fefc91fb4a.jpg

    Figure 9: The path of Test C                                                                                                          

    Graph 3: Test C reading

     

    Test D                                                                                                                                                                                             

    40 cm Resistograph® reading taken to attempt to observe if there was any noticeable effect on the reading from the presence of pseudosclerotial plates (black demarcation lines) within the cross section.

     

    Interpretation                                                                                                                                                                           

    The above reading appears to suggest that the pseudosclerotial plates could possibly be differentiated as there is a peak at 16 cm where the first black line shows at the crossing point between two red lines labelled C and D on the cross section.

     

    FullSizeRender.thumb.jpg.e42a174220882aac503f0283a1e998a0.jpg59b15901c93c0_Kretzschtest4.thumb.jpg.6307065b700e2c24dd76e816f838e3cd.jpg 

    Figure 10 above: The path of Test D.                                                                                        

    Graph 4: Test D reading.

     

    Test E                                                                                                                                                                                    

    The following is a shorter (15 cm) Resistograph® reading taken to assess a noticeable reaction zone.

     

    Interpretation                                                                                                                                                                     

    Beyond the functional sapwood where the graph (below) shows a consistent level reading between 3-7 cm, there is then what we perceive to be a definite (green coloured) reaction zone between 7- 8.5 cm which seems to show as more erratic peaking than the functional wood immediately to the right.

    The above image appears to show a different level of moisture content in the span of the reaction zone in between the adjacent wet sound and dried decayed wood sections. As found by Pearce (2000)3 This would indicate the changing from functional, through dysfunctional then into decayed wood.

     

    The following example and reading is from a different fallen lime also with evident fruiting bodies of K. deusta at its base, which again appears to show the reaction zone between early stage decay and intact sapwood.

    Both torque (green) and penetration (blue) increase in resistance between 4 -5.5 cm before going into the decayed section.

     

    IMG_7772.thumb.JPG.78098e2a5dabb2c9ccfdf0acf737ab6e.JPG59b15905d0475_TestE.thumb.jpg.8632b4f448df1c631eff59cf350ecc66.jpg

    Figure 11: The path of Test E.                                                                                                    

    Graph 5: Test E reading.

     

    Test F

    Figure 12 and Graph 6 show a different fallen lime, also with evident fruiting bodies of K. deusta at its base. The short cm reading again appears to show the reaction zone between early stage decay and intact sapwood. Both torque (green) and penetration (blue) increase in resistance between 4cm and 5.5cm before going into the decayed section.

     

    IMG_7788.thumb.JPG.e41c26b577a12d8ee5a94945c8fae6fa.JPG   3.jpg.7577beab69027ce48963198ef5201815.jpg

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    Figure 12 above: Test F: a second fallen lime was tested                                              

    Graph 6: Test F Reading from the second fallen lime.

     

    IMG_7785.thumb.JPG.b2f7247b98fc20cc55cef26877a611c0.JPG 

     IMG_7784.thumb.JPG.264e3b3c361b82dc3014081e9628cf04.JPG

    Figures13 and 14: (above) a standing lime infected on one side by K.deusta was the subject of tests G and H

     

    Test G and H

    The next example is a standing lime infected on one side by K. deusta. Which was drilled to show that the decay is detectable without seeing it through a cross section.                                                        

    The first graph (on the left) reads through the decayed portion of the trunk clearly evident at the outer edge of the stem near to fruiting bodies. The second graph (on the right) was taken on the opposite side of the trunk through functional wood and then into decayed portion of the trunk.

     

    Interpretation

    The left graph shows significantly decayed wood through the entire reading whilst the graph on the right shows functional wood until approximately 14.5 cm where the early stage decay extends to.

     

    1.thumb.jpg.fb90652019a610d6b2d651199e2b4b7d.jpg 2.thumb.jpg.a47fcc1874596bdd547322483cf76ec9.jpg

    Graphs  and 8: Tests G and H: Readings from the tree in Figures 13 and 14.

     

    Visual comparison of other decay types

    Here we look at observations of the brown rot caused by Laetiporus sulphureus within oak with the associated Resistograph® reading.

     

    Brown rot Test I

    Interpretation

    Graph 9 shows functional intact wood from 2 – 15 cm, then the drops off indicating significant brown rot with almost negligible resistance (blue) before penetrating sound wood again. There is some shaft resistance indicated by the blue penetrating force rather than dropping to zero level. If this was early stage decay of K. deusta, this section of the graph (between 17 cm – 28 cm). would show as a higher and more erratic reading of penetration force.

    DSCF9592.thumb.JPG.fa43b0e498e4ae24127b2f86b572b1eb.JPG 59b1af5a53d15_Laetioaktest.thumb.jpg.7a6097e7a050fabbc2b298e2e3e73b2f.jpg 

    Figure 15: Test I: oak with brown rot caused by L. sulphureus                                      

    Graph 9: Test I: Reading from the tree in figure 15


    White Rot Test J 

    Below the white rot image (Figure 16) shows similar texture & degradation to the late stage decay in Test A.                                         

    This image is purely an example of the white rot type of Ganoderma australe on ash.

     

    Interpretation

    The above graph shows a short span of early stage white rot then through in to late stage white rot.

     

    IMG_6914.thumb.JPG.f7a2fe878e5cc40d24d7e0b309b4eeee.JPG  59b1b30e0e0c3_FullSizeRender(1).thumb.jpg.70afaa419d1b888fa0342b4f04896dae.jpg

    Figure 16: Test J: white rot type of Ganoderma australe within ash                            

    Graph 10: reading from the tree in Figure 16.

     

     

    Conclusion

    So, can early stage decay of K. deusta be detected & differentiated from other decay types using a micro drill?   

    The offered examples shown throughout this article consistently demonstrate that the decay of K. deusta can be detected via the use of a Resistograph® & decay types can be differentiated by their signature readings, for example the graph of Test A against the brown rot graph.

    Having looked for change in resistance at the point of psuedoslerotial plates in Test E, we have not found anything concrete to suggest that a micro drill can pick up on the demarcation lines but it is evident that the Resistograph® can show different intensities within the same decay.

    Diagnosis should not wholly rely on a single Resistograph® reading as although decay associated with K. deusta can be detected, a practitioner should also rely on additional clues like multiple fruiting around the circumference, body language and growing knowledge based on field  observations of instances of inspection, failure, dysfunction & autopsy.                                     

    This mirrors the reasoning that tree inspection is an art as well as a science.

     

    IMG_7771.thumb.JPG.da750b4cfe503895452f9d53dc143a78.JPG 

     

    Acknowledgements

    We are grateful to Duncan Slater (Senior lecturer in arboriculture at Myerscough College) for his valuable comments and engaging us to reassess the complexity around K. deusta as a soft/facilitative decay type during the process of writing this article.

    Also the City of London Corporation, in facilitating the time to explore the subject to this degree.

     

    References

    1 Lonsdale, D. Principles of Tree Hazard Assessment and Management. Forestry Commission 1999

    2  Watson, G. Green, T. Fungi on Trees - An Arborists’ Field Guide. Arboricultural Association 2011

    3 Pearce R. B. Decay development and its restriction in trees; Journal of Arboriculture 26 (1) 2000

    Schwarze, F. W.M.R. Engels, J. Mattheck, C. Fungal Strategies of Wood Decay in Trees.                                

    Springer 2000

    Webber, K. Mattheck, C. Manual of Wood decays in Trees. Arboricultural Association 2003

     

     

    All images are the authors own: david.humphries@cityoflondon.gov.uk

     

    This article was first published in the Arb Magazine, Issue, Summer 2015 

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

     

    IMG_7752.JPG

    IMG_7772.JPG

    Laeti oak test .jpg

    IMG_8592.JPG

    Test E.jpg

    • Like 1


    User Feedback


    On 9/7/2017 at 22:16, Paul Barton said:

    Superb article David - thanks very much for sharing. I shall approach trees with K. deusta with more confidence now!

    Thank you Paul, glad you found it of interest.

    Ali & I found the interaction with Duncan Slater thought provoking & inspiring.

     

    Do Barton Hyett Associates use use micro drill or tomography, or both?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Hi David - we use both but hire the equipment in so they don't come out that often. We're getting more and more requests for detailed assessments though which is great. 

     

    Duncan Slater is a great thinker and happy to challenge assumed norms about what we think we know in Arboriculture. I can imagine the time with him and Ali was very interesting!

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    1 hour ago, Paul Barton said:

    Hi David - we use both but hire the equipment in so they don't come out that often. We're getting more and more requests for detailed assessments though which is great. 

     

    Duncan Slater is a great thinker and happy to challenge assumed norms about what we think we know in Arboriculture. I can imagine the time with him and Ali was very interesting!

    What tends to govern which technology you use in decay mapping Paul, is it ease of use, trunk size, location of dysfunction or other?

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites

    Thank you for another interesting post, which must have taken a significant amount of time and effort to conduct your research, well done.

     

    N

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites
    13 hours ago, David Humphries said:

    What tends to govern which technology you use in decay mapping Paul, is it ease of use, trunk size, location of dysfunction or other?

    Location of the symptom of dysfunction is definitely a big factor - anything above 2 metres is hard work with a bunch of sensors and cables for the Picus, but I'm quite happy using a micro-drill off a rope and harness.

     

    Other than that, I think about the outcomes of what each piece of equipment can produce, and what that will mean for the client.  A Resistograph reading is fairly abstract, and of course limited because it only tells me the condition of wood in a single plan at a particular angle - therefore it's very much about first interpreting the body language of the tree and choosing the right location to drill to tell me the important information.  Although the Picus also needs interpretation, it gives a much more readily understandable image of what may be occurring in one plane - for high value trees where decisions need to be justified to non-arbs a Picus is quite helpful in painting a picture of the issue at hand.

     

    Budget (of the client) and invasiveness also figure in my choice; the Picus being more expensive but less invasive.

     

     

     

     

    Share this comment


    Link to comment
    Share on other sites


    Create an account or sign in to comment

    You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

    Create an account

    Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

    Register a new account

    Sign in

    Already have an account? Sign in here.

    Sign In Now


About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Get in touch

facebook feed

Recent tweets

×