Steven P

I'm not an expert but going to add this here, maybe that will prompt someone more knowledgeable to answer? 350 year old oak tree How old is the house? When did the subsidence start occurring? For example, if the house is say 50 years old, the tree 350 years old and the subsidence was noticed 5 years ago.... I am guessing that -something- else is the root cause (if you excuse the term), you can trim the tree as much as you like, put in root barriers and so on... but from what I have read here that might not be the cure. I am suspecting that the builder - maybe at the time following the regulations they needed to - didn't build the foundations to take the trees into account. Might be you have to pay for an independent assessment, not necessarily an arborist, perhaps a structural engineer or similar for advice.

"Mighty oaks from little acorns grow".... little bit of work now pays off in the future. To add do dormant trees - if it has leaves, it is too late to move this year (without taking a great lump of soil and roots undisturbed with it).

I don't follow them but this sentence is always telling: "When Mr Murrell was arrested last year, police searched the house he shares with Ms Sturgeon in Glasgow", as opposed to "his wife, Ms Sturgeon", they are never written about as a married couple more a business arrangement.

Predicting some of the questions, what is the wall behind it - house wall or garden wall? Thinking of the future when this gets bigger, will it be a problem - maybe transplanting it somewhere more suitable?

Yes, take it back to another thread and not spamming this one whining about something not relevant here. Will respond where it is relevant.

hold on, who brought up other threads on this one? Ahh....

But you are needing to consider the competency levels of the UK to create any national infrastructure. We 'invented' the railways, can't build one now, we created Calderhall from scratch, struggling like the railways to build one (worldwide average for a nuclear plant is about 18 years from concept to production, something like that). Nothing much wrong with nuclear, but we have to build them and get them accepted by the locals where we site them

In whose back yard though? Nuclear makes sense... but.... no one wants one near their homes. (and considering our latest effort is going to take 30 years to be productive it is cutting it quite fine)

And the alternative in about 30 years time as the oil runs out? (Wikipedia has a nice chart showing the current predictions) Turn everything off maybe?

Drugs, sugar, plastic bags, tobacco, alcohol, some dogs, vaping? are all put in the governments "Too hard to deal with it in this parliament, lets ban it" bucket. Take a longer term approach and education, good habits, social acceptance and so on you don't need to ban nearly as much. But... that means you have to fix the early years education system, the primary school years education system, the secondary education system to fit that in, provide or encourage alternatives, and then wait 20 or 30 years for those children to become adults, and then parents to pass all that on to the next generation and change society. So it goes into the too hard bucket, no political gain in a 30 year program to do good, ban it all. So not sure a ban is a good thing, educate and let us work it out. As for drugs - I could support some sort of legalisation to remove them from criminality, but am not sure this would work - we have had years of no education just blanket "Zammo says don't", if they legalised a lot of drugs I could see the UK going on a massive bender for a couple of years. The alternatives to tobacco and alcohol (that we would do instead) are not good sources of tax income - take away the 22 billion or so from Tobacco and Alcohol duty (plus a couple of billion on sugar taxes) and we are looking at 25 billion in fuel duties going when we all get electric cars.... I might also wonder if the chancellor is as keen as the prime ministers say they are to ban everything./

Going back a couple of posts, as Tesco says "Every Little Helps". Some countries have a lot of rivers, hydro power, some have a lot of sun, some a lot of wind (we are quite windy), got to make the most of what we have. Interconnectors are useful - we can take Norwegian Hydro in the UK, California takes Canadian hydro electric (also in the UK a connection to France and the rest of Europe so could be tied into their nuclear power as well). Interconnector to Ireland allows that to pass through. Since Europe is so large this helps balance power so we don't all need spare generators spinning taking power and can be more efficient. I've seen the one about a swimming pool on top of a data centre which costs the council nothing to heat (and saves the data centre money with better cooling) - like I said, every little helps!

Curious here - how many deer would typically be in 25,000 acres, 6 farms?

If it was mine... Does the lady have children / likely to have children / young grand children who would appreciate a flat outdoor space to run around in? If not then I'd go with the other answer and have some stepped level changes through the garden to add interest to it. Looks like the 3rd fence panel down is a high spot so lower that a bit and use the soil to build up as necessary... but if you are doing all of that then yes, get rid of the stumps

I was going to add that some specialised fibre optics also have a LV pwer cable in them or are routed along side one. If you have the budget to do the training then it will add a confidence to the customer

Vaguely that rings a bell, and young ferns are OK for sheep too - vague memory.

That's a lido then - posh outdoor swimming pools all the rage now

Yes, Southport did that when they got around to it.

Ahh, one of those hairy horny beasts?

Slit as soon as you get it, leylandii for me are usually good to in a year. Mind same for all woods... split as soon as you get it. I can't comment on 3 year old logs, never kept any that long but never really had a soot problem off them

She should have the decency to clap along in time I reckon. However guilty as charged... I wasn't in Shropshire but guess what I was doing this morning? Got to encourage them to run faster so I can find whoever has the flask of luke walk tea. (I was in the woods this morning, bottom of a slippery slope watching them style it out as they slid, less clapping but more piss taking really)

I can't ever remember expressing an opinion of her on this forum, though Mick has seriously disturbed my evening now. Watching her thatch and whilst gently mooing. Makes me shiver. I might have mis-quoted him.

A rare chance to agree with you there! There are very few politicians who are engineers or project mangers who can understand how to deliver a project on time (these ferries, the trains to Birmingham, Hinkley power station....), but they understand that throw enough money at something it will all go OK However... Scottish Daily Express.... you need to change your morning papers, but at least there is a headline there that isn't reminiscing that the world went wrong in 1997.

Bigger problem that Asda doesn't have a runway yet..... (a lot by the way)

True, but I don't think you could cover all aspects all at once. Could add in a portion onto new tyres and brakes but then people might leave them longer before replacing them. EVs arn't quite as bad as reported with regenerative braking not using brake pads, however I get the point on them focussing on the wrong pollution for now. Certainly a problem for those that create taxes to replace fuel taxes and not penalise those who don't have cars with taxes on domestic electric bills, same with car tax, what to do. I am just thinking that 5 to 10 years time the charging system will be different to what we have today - what to do to keep it reasonable, and unbiased.