AHPP

Nothing will stop violence. We've been braying each other with sticks and jawbones since day dot. People with no regard for the law will be violent with whatever they can get and people who do follow the law will have nothing. You could carry here only a hundred years ago. There was no epidemic of unwanted/unnecessary shootings. At what point do individual rights become eclipsed by group rights? How many people? If individual rights are bricks, at what point does a wall made of bricks cease to be bricks and only be a wall?

No. Merge them. Everything section 2. Next week, everything deregulated.

@markieg31 I'm not interested in the US. I'm interested in surviving someone wanting to stick a screwdriver in my stomach in England. Why should anyone be able to tell me, "No. Run the higher risk or we'll put you in prison." Why should a jewish father in Australia have to just hide his wife and kids behind a bin and hope the shooting stops? Some bloke steps round the corner and points his rifle at your children first. He's there with nothing. That's not fair.

For anyone interested in studying the battlefield and coming to their own conclusions on tactics and winning the firefight, I'd suggest google streetview. The girl in orange sandals and the long shirt carries herself with a very agreeable ease.

Good question. Don't know.

It's not a surprise nor unreasonable that the coppers couldn't get there and fix it in under x minutes. There aren't many of them, cities are big and congested; it takes time to go places and time to make sure they're not being ambushed on the way in etc (remember the policewoman in Machester who got lured into a grenade attack). The problem is the authorities know this but prevent people from defending themselves anyway. They assume the individual's right to self-defence on the basis that they will use that right and power instead, to do for the individual what they would have ordinarily done for themselves. Then they don't keep up their end of the bargain. It's a failed short-sell. They borrow more than they can pay back. They're a shepherd who tethers his stock and goes to bed rather than watch them. He knows he can't stay awake all night and that if a wolf comes, he can't do much. But he still prevents them saving themselves.

Just loads of individual ones. And loads of other individual offences that could have been deterred by the possibility of armed opposition or thwarted by actual armed opposition.

I’ve already paid for the ones strapped to a policeman though.

The same thing as before I tried. Why does nobody level that argument at state police, military etc? If I wanted to do what the Bondi blokes did, I’d hit an armed copper with a car and take his guns.

Only Steven took me up on governments disarming jews. Matty had the good sense to keep his tyrannical desires to himself. Markie ducked it like a Paxman interview when he saw what I was driving at. What was I driving at? The 1930s German government disarmed jews. The 1940s German government pushed them onto trains then gassed them to death. That’s why governments shouldn’t be able to disarm people. Don’t be silly, Alex. They disarm everyone equally these days. Everyone but themselves you might note.

It might sound like you’re joking but you’re not or you shouldn’t be. You need equal or greater force to resist a given force.

Time to seriously talk about common sense car control laws.

Can’t remember which thread was recently praising the excellent gifs from American Psycho. 131 тыс. просмотров · 154 реакции | It’s what he would have wanted I... WWW.FACEBOOK.COM It’s what he would have wanted I am sure ◼️

I'll wait until tomorrow for the answers to my jewish problem. Until then, enjoy something gratuitous:

Should governments stop jews having guns? Yes or no?

Play along and answer my question first please.

Right. I'm nipping out for some drink. Let's do this!

Should governments stop jews having guns? Include as much or as little explanation of your answer as you like as long as the first word is yes or no.

Yeah. Get it fact checked by the British state media. Then it'll be super legit.

Enhance.

I eat lead shot pheasant once or twice a day. Only when I'm not eating bacon once or twice a day of course.

While the tasteful period of time expires and everyone can then get to deporting foreigners, criminals, foreign criminals etc, I'll get in first with my cause. The Australian state bars people from carrying firearms for self defence. Let's say there were 1000 jews in the park. Let's say it was all families of husband + wife + two kids. 250 men. The jews know everyone hates them. They're also fighters. If 10% of the 250 men there were carrying, that would be 25 armed men. That's a platoon. If the 2 chancers knew what they might be up against, would they have done it? I suspect only if they wanted to appear on the front page of Jew Today, full of holes, under the headline, 'DON'T MESS WITH JEWS.' Death toll currently 15. We can safely assume all 15 of them were praying for the (armed) police to arrive in seconds, not minutes. At least some of them will have been crouched behind a bin, thinking, "Christ. I need a gun, now. And some politician (with armed guards that the little people pay for) will look into the eyes of their widows, widowers, orphans etc and say no. Indefensible.

I thought the opposite, that they were pretty ineffectual. Over a thousand people present, probably pretty easy targets, almost certainly unarmed, and hemmed in by the sea. Two of them only hit forty people. Could have been way more effective with only a tiny amount more effort. They could have trained for a start. They could have armed themselves with better guns and carried a thousand rounds each. They could have planned a bit more. The footage principally shows them standing there looking like they don't know what to do next, since they usually get killed on CoD by then. Obviously terrifying but should have been fish in a barrel and it wasn't.

**************** you and the horse you rode in on.