Big J

It's the same argument I use for keeping my older wife. Replacing her with a younger model might seem like an attractive option, but in the end it's much more resource intensive. Perhaps you'd get improved performance, but ultimately you pay for it. 😆 (ps, this post was approved by the editor/censor (ie, my wife) prior to upload - I am sure I have some trousers somewhere, but I sure as hell don't wear them)

I’m spreading the word about the benefits of eating dried grapes. It’s all about raisin awareness

You can blame Radio 4 for that one 😄 Dr Phil's bedside Manner, 18:30 today. Apparently, this was a joke told to a surgeon by an 11 year old he was about to operate on.

Why did Sally fall off the swing? Sally has no arms. Knock knock Who's there? Well it's not Sally

It's not a great photo to be honest. It's actually a rather nice tree, though I am biased towards eucs They don't need to open up the view as the garden is wide, so they have plenty of space to look at the fields. It's the only tree in the garden, and given that it's a fairly large garden, removing it would leave it lacking somewhat.

It's not nitens, so not super fast growing and it's been reduced in the past. What would you do instead?

The tree in question

I admire the original tack at attracting interest for your position, but there is a reason why houses are so cheap in the bit between Edinburgh and Glasgow. And it's not a lack of employment. With the towns and villages, it's like they try to harl (pebble dash) the joy out of their conurbations.

Friends of ours in Wincanton have a fairly small eucalyptus in their back garden in need of reduction. It's an easy afternoons work. Nothing vulnerable underneath it, good access to the back garden and the tree is only about 40ft tall. Please PM me if you can help. Apologies for the lack of a photo. I can get one shortly.

My take on the lorry driver shortage is this. I should add that my dad drove rigid 14 tonners for most of my childhood, so I'm not entirely ignorant of the industry, especially given that most of my professional life now is dictated on how I get timber off site and how much it costs to do so. There is obviously a shortage of HGV drivers, but I think that the problem isn't just down to pay or leaving the EU. There is a fundamental skills issue when it comes to drivers in the the UK, full stop. How many people pass their tests with 10-20 45 minute lessons and then never undertake any further CPC regarding the operation of a vehicle? This has the following knock-on effects: There is a massive chasm in driver skill needed to step up to operating HGVs There is simply no appreciation for the limitations and challenges of operating a large vehicle, so HGV drivers are often at the receiving end of a lot of aggression from other motorists. Beyond the lack of skills of Joe Bloggs, the infrastructure (as has been touched upon already) is lacking to support our hauliers and our road network is horribly crowded and under-maintained. I can imagine that spending 50 hours a week threading a 44t wagon through traffic and hideously narrow lanes (we have a lot of those in Devon 😏) is hell. I personally couldn't imagine anything worse, even with the pay incentives now. If I was in charge (God help us all), I'd make the initial licence to operate a motor vehicle on the road much harder to attain. Take the Finnish approach - if I remember correctly it's a minimum 2 year period on a provisional licence and you have undertake exercises such as skid pan training. If we upped the overall skill level of British drivers, there would maybe be more appreciation for the very tough work hauliers do and there would be more people prepared to step into that industry. As for simply giving people a trailer licence if they ask for one......that's pretty terrifying. A badly loaded, badly maintained trailer grossing 3500kg has the potential to do some serious harm. I regard myself as a very good driver of trailers, but even with 40-50k miles under my belt (at least, it's just a guess) of heavy trailer towing, I still treat the endeavour with the utmost respect and caution. In summary, more training, not less and sort the bloody roads out 😄

3 minutes and 6 seconds. No, not the length of my last love making session.... 3 minutes and 6 seconds is how much sunshine we had today 😄

Pretty crap for the last few weeks here. Have barely seen the sun. It's not that the weather is extreme - it's more like the absence of weather. Grey skies, low temperatures, breezy. Looking at the weather recorded so far, we're on track at the moment to potentially see the least sunny August since records began in England. http://starlingsroost.asuscomm.com/weather/ukobs/ukgraphs.php?type=monthlyregional&param=Sunshine&field=year&region=UK&month=8&sort=ASC

That is seriously impressive. The fastest growing of the eucs we've planted so far are on a site near Chard. They are 16 months old and the tallest in the block was 4.2m as of last Tuesday. It's growing 2.3cm a day though at the moment (it was measured at 3.8m 17 days previously). It's actually a denticulata, but the majority of the block is nitens, with many of them 3m plus. 70mm thick stems 500mm above the ground too. What is the height of your tree and do you have any photos of the full tree?

We're on a nice first thinnings site near Barnstaple with some rapidly grown larch and sitka. It's not been well planted (in terms of spacing, so the rack in the photo starts off at about 5m wide and ends up at lest than 3m, but we're getting through it. Probably the last outing for the Kranman processor, but it's performing brilliantly. It's got about 450t ahead of it to do (at least) but it's ideal most of the block as it's too steep to drive for any small machine. As such, the fact that it winch loads itself saves a lot of double handling. The complete rack (33 trees or so) took only 2hrs to process, and I forwarded it out in another 45 minutes with the Vimek, totalling about 9 tonne. We're not cutting sawlog out of the larch as it's bendy as hell (you could scrabble some, but it's not worth it) but we are cutting 3.7s in the spruce.

I'm on a first thinning job just outside Barnstaple (Devon) at the moment and have a 0.6 hectare block of crappy larch that is being largely clearfelled. About 10% of the trees will be retained, but due to poor form, the decision has been made to clear the remainder. I just don't have enough time to do this alongside the thinning too. I'm harvesting with the Kranman P25B processor, which is doing a great job in the thinnings, but I fear that the larch clearfell trees are a bit bendy. So ideally looking for a pair of cutters to tackle the block. I reckon 7 straight days ought to clear it (14 man days). If you like surfing, there are obviously many opportunities nearby. There is space for a caravan on site and I don't mind how long it takes you to complete the work so long as it's done before the 2nd week of September. Specification is super simple. 3m for everything, with some stacking required, but nothing excessive. A good hourly/day rate will be paid.

The problem is that efficiently operating a stove isn't something that most people can easily pick up by just looking at a pamphlet. You need to be interested in it and want to get it just right. I used to enjoy the art of it, but after 12 years and about 360-400 cubic metres through my own stoves, the novelty has worn off.

That wasn't my intention. What I'm saying is that it doesn't matter how diligent a retailer is (best before and use by dates, for example), a person can still do themselves harm by ignoring the guidance. Given that the average person has a better understanding of food safety than efficient fire usage, I'd say that the Woodsure scheme will have little effect on improving burning practices or reducing emissions. I'm entirely in favour of electric vehicles and reducing domestic firewood usage. I say that as someone with a V10 Touareg and a 20kw stove. I can't wait until my car simply plugs in and I no longer have to feed a stove. However, legislating like this punishes the retailer who is fundamentally selling a sound product. There is no such thing as bad firewood. There is only firewood that is sufficiently dry and firewood that needs more drying time. The education and legislation needs to be targeted at the end user, not the retailer. Ban open fires, ban inefficient stoves, make flue pipe thermometers compulsory or even automatic vents to moderate air flow. Educate the end user and stop punishing the retailers for idiots that don't know how to use a fire or what to burn.

Tom D said to me about 13 odd years ago - "selling firewood is selling the unprofitable to the ungrateful" I'd added to that - "selling firewood is selling the unprofitable to the uneducated and ungrateful" To which you can now add "selling firewood is selling the unprofitable to the uneducated and ungrateful through an ill conceived and poorly implemented government cartel" I take my hat off to any of you who have jumped through the hoops to comply. It's patently bollocks and is designed to force out the smaller producers. The responsibility for burning firewood that is dry shouldn't lie with the retailer. The retailer has no control over what the consumer does after it's delivered. It could be a crispy 10% MC after being baked in a kiln when tipped but a customer leaving it out overnight in the rain will result in it exceeding 20%. Supermarkets sell food that is in date and fit for consumption. It's the consumer's responsibility to ensure that they eat it when it is fresh. The Woodsure scheme punishing firewood retailers for customers using wet wood is like fining supermarkets for customers eating out of date food. Education of the consumer is the key, but I think it's a exercise in futility. I had to explain to a lady on the Brits in Sweden page on Facebook (so you'd think they'd be a little more clued up) that no, burning pine isn't going to tar up your chimney. She was quite adamant.

I've planted a fair few Poplar cuttings this year. These are in a park in the town. They've been doing really well, but three of them have suddenly died (not at the same time) when in apparently good health. Growth has been vigorous, they are planted by a stream and completely unstressed. The tree next to this one is a bushy 4ft tall with no I'll health but this one has succumbed. Any help is much appreciated.

It is just painful to watch some people trying to reverse. It's not just the tourists either. The chap that hit me a couple of years ago when I had the 4x4 Sprinter lives in the valley where I met him, and chatting to his landlord we concluded he'd won his licence in a raffle. I just go with the principle that if I'm dotting about in my Berlingo, I'm going to be able to reverse quicker than 99% of the people I meet, so rather than watch them weave around awkwardly, I just pop it into reverse and suck it up. I actually have to laugh sometimes (out loud) out how ridiculously awful journeys can be. Moving the forwarder yesterday, it was only going 4 miles as the crow flies. Shortest route through the lanes is 7 miles. It's about 12 miles via Barnstaple. I went through the lanes and the tractor went through Barnstaple. The tractor actually beat me.

That popped up on my Facebook feed yesterday, but I'll admit that I didn't watch it. 😄 I had a mare of a day around Barnstaple yesterday on the stupid mediaeval farm tracks. A total of about 1/2 mile of uphill single track lane reversing (because it's nearly always faster for me to do it than to determine whether they can or not). I ended up cross cambered in a pull-in at one stage too, drive wheel in the air. Fun times. Added to that was my tractor driver moving the forwarder, who missed the turnaround spot just past my site and somehow shoehorned a 55ft long rig (trailer and tractor) all the way to the top of a very narrow lane. Fortunately the house at the top were really friendly and we got turned in the field. That was an unnecessary 1 1/4 mile walk to find a lost tractor. I am fully aware that I should have realised what life would be like, working in this backwater that the 20th century somehow missed. It doesn't make it any less ridiculous though.