LGP Eddie

I've just had a patch of Rhodie we couldn't access with the Mulcher and needed a solution to get things moving quickly with the guys I have available. The answer was in the form of a friends Takeuchi TB016 that I regularly hire and getting it equipped with a thumb. Having searched about, we collected this from Digbits for £275 plus VAT and it's been simply brilliant. Well built and easily fitted it's transformed the machine and the owner was pretty upset he'd not gone one the day he bought the digger! The only thing is the lack of adjustment in the stay rod, and we're going to switch this out for a converted tractor top link that will allow the thumb to be positioned more accurately to suit different buckets. A nice hydraulic setup would be really nice, but for the money this has paid for itself in a week. Eddie.

With the correct pads on machines like the conventional Takeuchi or Kubota that have slightly reduced radius they're so close to zero it doesn't matter, I'd still maintain you're better off than the telephone box cabs and limited access panels that come with zero tailswing machines. The pads are 900mm and I hope to upgrade to the Dash 4 Kubota if it's as good as my current Dash 4 KX57. Eddie.

[quote You would be a fool not to buy a Takeuchi 180 zero tail. Very powerful hydraulics and great for forestry and also fantastic for construction work. You'd also be a fool to land yourself with the horrendous takeuchi FR offset arrangement that will end up a sloppy mess very quickly. Don't get hung up on Zero swing as it comes with so many other issues from cramped cabs to poor maintenance access and less stability. They also tend to have higher centre's of gravity which isn't ideal for the steep stuff, plus generally wide undercarriages with narrow track pads as opposed to keeping things a sensible width and pushing the pads wider. Very few situations where the zero swing will be an advantage, but the day to day compromises on the machine have to be lived with all the time. I rate certain Takeuchi models very highly and their new standard 8 tonner looks superb, but the latest Kubota Dash 4 is out very shortly too to possibly raise the bar again? One thing 8 tonners are really eating into 13 tonne market now. Eddie.

Obviously I'm going to vote Kubota, but that's backed by nearly 3 1/2 years of use in some pretty tough going with a multitude of attachments and I doubt it's ever done more than a handful of hours with simply a bucket direct to the quick hitch. The simple fact is the Kubota has the metal in them in the right places and if you compare the slew rings of something like the CAT or Hitachi they are simply tiny, which isn't great for constant attachment use. The same goes for pin sizes and only Takeuchi have upped the stakes with their latest offering which I'm keen to get a look at. Having had about 50 days constant use with an FAE DML/HY fixed tooth head on the machine, this really is pretty much as good as it gets out of a standard 8 tonne excavator and I'd look to go with a power pack if I upgrade in future. There have been no cooling issues and the Kubota is fully intended to utilise attachments with a 4 line setup as standard. For a good all rounder get some 600mm steel tracks on a KX080 and it'll be close enough to zero swing anyway. Change the top rollers for a bottom roller (easily fabricated) to get a better grip on the chain and make certain you have the track guide plates installed. The blade will require two small extensions to cover the extra width, but with this done you'll have a great all rounder that's still compact enough. Wait a month or so and you can have my 8 tonne unit! As for Kubota backup, very good anyway but you'll not need much if you look after it. As for the others, I'd put Takeuchi and Hitachi level second as both are superb machines with the Volvo/Komatsu third for being zero swing machines with all the hassles that brings in terms of access issues and balance. The CAT, forget it! They have absolutely no vision or tracking power whatsoever. Eddie. The Kubota can be Zero swing too!

I have a Herbst Contractor low loader which is basically a pretty low spec unit, but perfect for the application I required it for. I would say the quality is certainly good and better than some examples of trailers I have seen. The only issues I have is problems getting grease into some of the nipples properly, but apart from that it's been an excellent bit of kit. If I go again with a low loader I'll probably opt for a Kane unit as I very much like their hydraulic beavertail unit that doubles as a flat trailer and they build really nice units. I'd recommend you look at an NC low loader as I'd consider these to be an excellent trailer that is very well thought out, with nice touches like the wooden floor higher than the metal side rails that helps loading tracked machines considerably. Mine was ex demo so the price won't help you much but they're all usually keen for a deal. Eddie.

Just returning it to bare soil minus all the mulch and shooting debris, but the rocks have to stay put. It's a bit of a nightmare as obviously a wider bucket will bridge over the rocks leaving material behind and teeth will snag on them plus tend to dislodge them. It really takes no longer to do it to this standard than the previous half effort, just a good showcase of the tilt rotators ability in such an application. I'd not say that was manicured just clean, and I could get fussy with a powered brush on the Engcon to scrub the rocks! Eddie.

Just a few picture of the current site I'm on with the 8 tonne Kubota unit. Basically it's a restoration job and the site has to be cleared of all bracken mulch and debris from the previous clay pigeon shoot operation. A previous contractor has actually claimed to have completed the work on this site! I'm not getting involved in any of that just cracking on to get it done, but it does demonstrate what's possible with a Tiltrotator system fitted as following all the rocks/contours is quite a challenge. The job is plenty steep in parts and the rocks certainly make things fun when they get under the tracks providing no traction whatsoever! I'm only a day into the job and feeling my way about, trying to sort out the previous efforts. However it's a lovely site and cracking view, with plenty of challenge to concentrate the mind. Eddie.

Tom, I might be tempted to move my full spec Farmi 260HFC on? It's immaculate and done very little work, ideal for crane feed with the conveyor and foot pedal controls for infeed. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=jZWshqt9oB4]Moorlands Specialist Excavations Farmi 260HFC Chipper. - YouTube[/ame] Eddie.

Tom, Are you looking to Hire or Purchase a machine? Eddie.

Not an Ag Rover but made me smile!:big grin: Used Unimog Mercedes 406 120, price : 27150 GBP for sale | Agriaffaires

The Australian upgrade is from the 3350kg to 3500kg on this latest model, and I can't see why we won't get it? Eddie.

I've just had a bit of a Google and the Ranger has definitely had an upgrade to 3500kg, but in the Australian Market. I assume this should filter through to the UK shortly as it seems to have involved some strengthening of the Chassis to get the additional capacity. Worth a call at least to a dealer to check? Please no more Landrover v Jap plus all the sorry Landrover gags, some of us just have to live with all the faults and look at the positives because nothing else can replace them at present. Eddie.

I'm certain the new Ford Ranger has been increased to 3499kg capacity now? I looked at one of these to replace my Defender 90, but quite simply for where I have to get on site sometimes with a 12ft Ifor tipper in tow, they are just too long. I really rated them though, looked a real solid bit of kit with plenty of options including the basic Farmer spec with steel wheels which is the way I'd have gone. I can't see Landrover ever ditching the 3500kg towing on a possible Defender replacement unless towing regulations have changed by then. I've just ended up with a new clutch in the TDCi at 40,000 miles (luckily under warranty), which was pretty disappointing when my 300TDi 90 on exactly the same duties was sold at 173,000 miles on the original clutch! Ranger is worth a look and that 5 cylinder must be a monster towing vehicle. Eddie.

I never mentioned the TB219 as in reality there's hardly any available used yet, but if someone is looking at new then yes it's got to be more than worth a look. They have a little more weight, reach, engine power, different pumps, more auxiliary flow for attachments and extend out a little wider for more stability. I'd go as far to say anyone who's actually looking to purchase new is onto an absolute winner with one of these, as they are certain to be very keenly sought after by those in the know as the ultimate mini that punches well over it's weight. The only possible negative I did see but I've not tried one yet, is they have made the blade stick out a ridiculous way in front of the machine for more stability which could prove awkward when manoeuvring around site. Possibly of interest is that Kubota again trump this machine with the special order KX019, which is actually available into the UK if you ask. This in reality is the ultimate of the class with all the bells/whistles and some nice touches like proportional auxiliary lines controlled via the joysticks usually reserved for larger machines. This model again is pushing into the 2 tonne class and pretty much matches the TB219 spec. One for an owner driver who wants all the nice bits and the peace of mind with Kubota reliability plus 3 year warranty from new to back that up. Very nice! http://www.esontrading.se/Broschyr%20KX019-4.pdf Eddie.

Just dug this pic out of the one I usually hire with it's owner. The owner bought himself an Oxdale splitter and it will power it all day on tick over. Handy to be able to set it at a comfortable height and makes transport easy! Eddie.

I think that almost any brand of mini digger are perfectly acceptable, and will give good service. Dare I say the one to avoid is the JCB, but again I know plenty of people who have no issues with them whatsoever. I suppose it's almost the Stihl/Husky debate all over again?:big grin: A decent dealer for whatever brand locally is something to think about and can certainly sway some purchasing decisions. I have really centred on the Tb016 from Takeuchi from many hours in the seat of one, plus the simple fact you'll not drive past many utility type works without seeing them used on long term self drive hire and it doesn't get much rougher than that work. The used market for them has always been exceptionally strong and this is where if people have spare funds to try one then they almost certainly won't lose out if they decide it isn't for them. The Kubota is very much the same with a legendary reputation for reliability and compared side by side look to be light years in front of the Takeuchi in terms of styling/built/finish/detailing. However as I say in rough work this can work against you with the nice panels costing a lot of money to replace. The Takeuchi's can be very easily refurbished with new paint/stickers and the odd dent knocked out the steel panels. Whatever brand you choose, a 1.5 tonner is something that can produce a large amount of work for very reasonable running costs. Eddie.

2.5 toners are a bit of an oddball in my opinion and can bring so many hassles when it comes to transport. I fully agree it is possible and i have done a lot of it, to move them with a suitable 3500kg tow vehicle. The hassles start to come in the larger trailers they require that really aren't as versatile to have about than the standard plant trailer or flatbed that 1.5 toners can be moved on easily. Weight and keeping something like legal is the other issue, with my Defender for example always being pretty well laden down itself and to keep things legal with a set of perhaps 5 buckets and a breaker to take with you it all gets a bit messy? I can honestly say that in most applications you'll hardly know the difference from a Takeuchi TB016/Kubota Kx018 to a 2.5 tonner? Weight always brings stronger digging/lifting performance, but real world it'll not do a lot more for the extra money and that's why I feel most then jump straight into the 3 tonne plus machines and go the 7.5 tonner route to stay legal. Blades that is a really nice unit and not all that common with the full cab, but in your location you'll need it!:big grin: Perhaps you could share just how little fuel you actually put through the Takeuchi in a days work? I hire one on a regular basis and am always shocked by how much work they'll do in a day on so little. I'd say you've got as sound investment there and pretty much money in the bank. I'm actually just on the lookout for one at the moment for myself for some fill in work and to have about the yard for lifting stuff about. I'll probably go down the Thumb route with it and won't be scared to send it out for a bit of self drive. Eddie.

1.5 toners are a complete no brainer in my opinion and if you have that sort of application then they are simply the cheapest man on the job. I've always found that having a digger on site clearance keeps the other operatives more motivated if they've got to work in front or alongside the machine. The Operator really has little need to stop apart from break times and everyone else has to keep pace with this. I'd say that the bet bet for anyone if their budget will run to it is to aim for a Takeuchi TB016 (expanding tracks). This machine really does punch above it's weight and has actually fooled many genuine operators that it's a 2.5 tonner! They have a very long reach for this class and are blessed with very smooth powerful hydraulics, but still very stable. These machines have a legendary reputation now among plant hire companies and are the machine of choice for the self drive fleets, because of their reliability along with simplicity plus the total lack of expensive plastic bits that can be damaged. A quick look around will show they fetch really good money and sell very quickly, meaning you'll pay a bit more to get into one but if it doesn't work out you probably won't lose a penny for having quite a bit of work out of one. I'd recommend fitting a Thumb and a Semi Quick Hitch for ease of use and great all round ability, with the Semi Quick Hitch helping prevent wear in the pins/bushes from bucket changes. A hydraulic Thumb would be a very nice luxury, but in this size of machine it's only a few minutes to remove a whole thumb assembly. I'm Kubota through and through, and if it were my own machine and nobody else were ever to go near it then the Kubota KX018 offers a superior package in terms of build/fit/finish, but in the self drive or tough applications a Takeuchi TB016 can't be beat. Get one bought is my advice and I doubt you'll regret it or even lose a penny if you do? Eddie.

Finally back in action today, we've had a fair dump around the Staffordshire Moorlands. Good fun Mulching the Rhodies with a nice spray of snow when you hit the tops! Laughed at the Valtra following me down to site in my Track marks, it really showed the difference as the Valtra sunk down 2ft in places and the Kubota had gone in a couple of inches. Eddie

It's a really hard one and I've been pondering over many different methods, including getting it off with a long reach excavator and weed cutting bucket. However the simple fact is they if the long reach goes down at any point on the site it's not possible to give much assistance with a weed cutting bucket fitted, plus the weed cutting bucket possibly won't be too effective. I'm happy to take the Valtra on with Duals all round, as if she goes down It'll take no plucking out with the winch and the Rotary slasher wouldn't come to any harm. I simply couldn't risk a Fingerbar, they're too fragile and wouldn't handle this amount of Rush I fear with a very low cut required. However I've always seen the advantages one of the big Reciprocating Mowers could bring in many applications and seem a very controlled bit of kit when you're used to Mulchers. I'm really down to two options at present, Long Reach Excavator on Bog Mats and simply dig the turf/Rushes off with a traditional bucket, thus enabling me to move the mats or try the Valtra and some form of Rotary Mower that is strong enough to cope. A simple traditional side mount twin drum disc mower would be the one to risk, but the problem is they mount so close they'd catch on the duals when swung into the work position. I've even considered lengthening one and fitting longer belts to go past the duals, as these can be found in the nettles at handy money that's worth the risk. No doubt we'll sort it one way or another!:big grin: Eddie.

Have you a rough location as I know 2 guys in Stoke with Mini Pavers and if it's Derby way, handy enough down the A50. Hard without any pictures of the paths, but you could get an excellent finish with a straightforward Mini Excavator and some blade mods. You basically need to get it out to the required with with some side skids of the required depth and some extra height to prevent material going over the top. A couple of side wings to retain material better and it would shock you what a good finish you will get. Try to use a decent size machine, as the weight will prevent riding up onto the material, a Tracked Skidsteer would be a good carrier too. It shouldn't take much fabricating and easily removed after. These are an type of Asphalt float so offset from the machine to do the pavement from the road, but similar idea. Eddie.

You may get someone with a Mini Paver to put the stone through it at a fixed rate per tonne. This used to be very common on large footpaths when they actually replaced them instead of trying to paint over the cracks with slurry sealer and hope it lasts 10 years. A mini paver will lay the stone extremely accurately to whatever width required within it's range and can obviously alter the width hydraulically to get around most obstacles. We used to feed them with either JCB or Dumper tipping directly into the hopper and with good operator produce brilliant results. I've not seen it in action but a local guy had a big hopper setup built to fit onto the back of a tractor that did 'twin tracks'. Apparently it does brilliant job of placing stone in the wheel tracks whilst leaving the grass strip in the centre. I would say you could easily knock something up, but paver and operator shouldn't be crazy expensive and inaccuracy will cost some money on 3km of 20mm to dust. Eddie.

I've got a particularly nasty job involving some Rushes on a pretty waterlogged site and have been looking at all options. Basically Flails are out as from experience, once they start shovelling water through themselves it's like hitting the brakes and much power is lost. I need a pretty low cut so at times it will be cutting in some water, hence looking at a Rotary Slasher with blades not Chains that should have less resistance. Two models I have seen are of interest, the Foster GG2000 and the Spearhead Destroyer. I just wonder if anyone has experience of either or actually knows of someone hiring them out? I have been looking for a half decent trailed 'Drum' not disc mower as this could be an option also, but they all see to have reputations for eating belts gearboxes etc so the Rotary Slasher should at least be strong enough? This Foster one seems to be going ok, but it's not a big crop to what we usually have to cope with. [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ec1mv0VdhoQ]Foster GG2000 Scrubcutter with heavy duty blades cutting wetland rushes - YouTube[/ame] Eddie.

Plenty of tracked Quads at LAMMA and a couple of dual wheel systems on display also. I'm a big fan of Stocks duals on tractors and their capabilities are brilliant in comparison to standard. A tracked quad will just be stupid money and plenty of other alternatives that will probably retain the money better and have more dual purpose. There is a company doing Schaad Dual wheel systems in Rugeley here PRODUCTS PRODUCT SEGMENTS STARCO.com. In my humble opinion it's something you could pretty much rig up yourself? I dualled up an old mini as a kid for the fields just by bolting rims together back to back and it transformed it. Hopefully Charlieh will be along soon as he's the man in the know about these. Eddie

Just a thought, but is there any way that you can get a smaller crane that has reasonable lift capacity to reach directly over one of the houses and possibly site it off the road in a driveway/garden with a few timber mats? It could then provide a means to get larger Chippers and even a Mini excavator over the house to handle bigger pieces ready for removal by crane. Perhaps even chip into skips and lift them directly over? It could save much work at reasonable cost? I'd love to see some pics of the job whatever way it's tackled, and I thought I got to price some adventures but for this you must push your balls around in a wheelbarrow! Eddie.