Making the news today....

[Johnsond]

7 minutes ago, manco said:

ive made up nothing. 

your posts stink very highly of the same kinda logic employed by those encouraging more rioting by associating a vile attack with immigration.

you seem intent on pouring hate on the police and authorities for trying to stamp down on the chaos and rioting.

you sound like the kinda person who spells african american with two Gs

youre saying the police lets the blacks riot but cracks down on the whites. thats taken directly from you saying its 2-tier policing letting the black lives matter protests go ahead but stamping down on violent white anti-immigrant riots.

you condemn the riots but ask why theyre cracking down on them more than when black people protested? thats how it looks.

you seem to support the thinking of the far right and the anti-immigrant views and politics.

lots of anti-left comments going on in what you post.

but mostly i think this is the comment that marks you out as being racist and secretly supporting the anti-immigrant thoughts

 

"Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid  attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK."

 

thats only being seen one way. theres no second way thats being viewed.

thats clearly you saying muslims are evil and are getting away with killing people and the whites waving union jacks while looting shops are innocent.

There’s a lot of stuff going on in your head that equals zero. All I’ve said is the law needs to be applied equally 

You can’t seem to cope with that at all. 

[Johnsond]

11 minutes ago, manco said:

since you ask, this was the comment that suggests he supports the riots and the racists

 

"Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid  attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. "

Put the rest of the post up to add some  context, actually I’ll add it just to allow some idea of why I asked the question. So in your world you are judged on what you alone find a comment may suggest ?? Talk about fascism eh 🤷‍♂️

Edited August 4, 2024 by Johnsond

[Johnsond]

6 minutes ago, manco said:

yet again, what you said was that white british arent engaged in or carrying out a mass casualty terror attack in the uk.

ive simply pointed out thats exactly what they are doing.

you dont seem able to cope with someone picking holes in your own statements.

Ok please show me where the mass casualties are you described. Manchester arena, London Bridge, Lee Rigby etc etc those are mass casualty events. Riots are Riots and regardless of who is involved the law should be applied equally. Put your ludicrous left wing bias aside for a minute and read what you are arguing against. 

[Johnsond]

11 minutes ago, manco said:

Can you point out the last time a union flag flying individual decapitated, bombed, shot or acid  attacked or generally carried out a mass casualty terror arrack in the UK. 

 

equally? i pointed out a "mass casualty terror attack in the uk" carried out by those claiming to be supporters of the uk, and you chose to pretend you didnt say it and start backpeddalling.

 

the last comment which you claim is stupid and shows lack of rationale, is nothing of the sort.

"if you defend the riots, or in any way support or justify the actions of those invovled youre as bad as the boy with the knife."

seems perfectly reasonable to me. 

Absolute rubbish 

[Johnsond]

5 minutes ago, manco said:

so youre saying that because they havent " decapitated, bombed, shot or acid  attacked" they are somehow innocent of all the carnage and destruction and less guilty than those of muslim faith engaged in what they consider a religious war?

should you not be judged on all things you say? 

youre the one talking about the far right, the far left, and fascism,

im just calling rioters scum. why do you choose to argue with that?

Those who riot regardless of race or religion should be treat equally. A religious war. You gotta to be ****************ing kidding. Slaughtering defenceless innocents, your whole argument and credibility has just evaporated, defending Islamic terrorism 🤷‍♂️disgusting immoral low life words far worse than any brick throwing thug. 

[Johnsond]

10 minutes ago, manco said:

all attacks carried out by muslims or immigrants, and they seem to be the attacks you have such a beef with.

but you seem fine to accept when white british flock to the area of a tragic event and start smashing the place up under claims of defending the local area they dont even live in?

and when more white british start more riots days later in other areas smashing shops, looting, burning. you seem to feel thats ok?

only the attacks by immigrants that you have a problem with? because those are the ones you pick out to mention.

fyi, i have no left wing, or right wing bias or standing, (more of a breast man myself).

i just have an anti-scum bias. is that a problem for you?

I’ll keep this simple as you seem to be struggling with what I’m saying and have for days. Treat all those rioting the same regardless of race, religion or political affiliation. If you are struggling with that get someone to explain it. I’ll leave you to your so called middle ground and support for islamic terror arracks. 

[Steven P]

Mass casualties... how many police officers have been put in hospital this week?

[Steven P]

On 31/07/2024 at 23:10, Johnsond said:

The information I received 42 was actually from a workmate who lives within walking distance of the incident, the facts I received were spot on “ young black male masked up armed with knives” . It seems you are all outraged over this but as I said in the post it was unusually quiet in regards the Army officer stabbing, The attacks on the police in Manchester airport and the Leeds Riots. 
 

 

A quick divergence, one for tomorrow for you, ask your workmate what the thoughts are in Southport of the riots happening all over the country. The answer might surprise you....

[Steven P]

1 hour ago, Johnsond said:

You can expect what you want SP but the fact still stands that the laws of this land must be applied equally regardless of race or religion. Arguing against that common sense idea is nothing but political bias. 

 

I have never said that the law is not applied evenly, I'll have to go back through the thread to find out where the idea that we have apparent 2 tier policing came from.

[Johnsond]

10 minutes ago, Steven P said:

 

I have never said that the law is not applied evenly, I'll have to go back through the thread to find out where the idea that we have apparent 2 tier policing came from.

I’m sure a lot of officers have been injured, apply the law equally and fairly to those responsible. 
Im sure he will be disgusted, again apply the law equally and fairly tho those responsible. 
The perception of a two tier system of policing has developed over time and  will continue to fester unless people see the law being applied equally and fairly regardless of race religion or political affiliation 🤷‍♂️it’s not rocket science.