Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Larch weights


Recommended Posts

timbernut, you say the larch was felled in a P Ramorum area, did you not have problems with movement authorisations for infected timber, I thought all the bark had to be removed, or the timber proccesed on site if your outside the control zone ( check the latest FC maps), not many sawmills will touch infected timber because of the costs involved in the equipment cleanup, you would be better trying to find someone with a large mobile setup willing to process on site, there would be much better returns on proccesed "clean" larch, (cladding, decking, anything involving external use), than infected timber destined for bio-mass

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

Yeah I'm well aware of the restrictions, and when I read the paper work was quite surprised as you can move it with bark on but no loose material, the timber can be taken to a licences mill who must thoroughly decontaminate mill after processing. However this larch would not be moved by road being shipped straight to BSW jetty at Fort William for milling.

I originally suggested milling on site but the owner shied away from the substantial investment needed (although if someone came up with a solid business plan he'd probably invest in it). I'd love to be more involved but am tied up with my own wood in Norfolk most of the time.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

timbernut, you say the larch was felled in a P Ramorum area, did you not have problems with movement authorisations for infected timber, I thought all the bark had to be removed, or the timber proccesed on site if your outside the control zone ( check the latest FC maps), not many sawmills will touch infected timber because of the costs involved in the equipment cleanup, you would be better trying to find someone with a large mobile setup willing to process on site, there would be much better returns on proccesed "clean" larch, (cladding, decking, anything involving external use), than infected timber destined for bio-mass

 

This was the scenario when PR kicked off, out of date info now. No diff between clean and infected price / processing / haulage anymore...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.