Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Just asking for some input towards this Oak that a customer wants to be taken down. It has a TPO so he is trying to get council approval for it to be removed but wants to be armed with some expert knowledge. It has been pollarded in the past a few times by the looks of it due to being in a small cul-de-sac and having phone lines running through/over it. It has a large amount of rot going up the trunk (very soft) and the root is non existent underneath this section. Also has a tear wound on one limb and has rot within that area. He's not interested in it being re-pollarded to reduce weight. He just wants it gone. Attached are a few photos. He also reckons it vibrates when the bin lorry comes down the road and goes over the roots.

 

Sorry for the sideways photos. Doesn't want to turn them the right way round :confused1:

IMG_2261.jpg.3fb6074a7b5b5a46b22ac0f7142bcaad.jpg

IMG_2260.jpg.f2c561d6350d0b7d755d1ff0ddf620a5.jpg

IMG_2259.jpg.db365ffbb2b5e126777fc22000c08593.jpg

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Looking at your pics I can see calus growth rib forming on left side of main Stem so tree is trying to heal the wound, regarding the extent of decay from pics hard to tell, best bet get a fully qualified consultant to assess the tree in person

Hope this helps

Posted

I'm guess he meant would instead of wouldn't.

Anyway it's got to go and replant another, this is ruined crappy oak, don't waste any more time on it, fell, grind replant. In ten years you'll have a nice plane/lime/whatever, whereas if you muck around with this you'll have a crappy ruined oak in ten years.

Posted
.............whereas if you muck around with this you'll have a crappy ruined oak in ten years.

 

But if managed sensitively, the owner and the neighbourhood could possibly have a "crappy ruined oak" for another twenty, thirty, forty, maybe even fifty years.

 

 

There's actually no rule that I've ever come across that states that trees really have to adhere to what may be percived as a perfect tree form.

 

 

.

Posted
Not sure I get this comment...

 

 

Sorry what I meant is that managing and retaining it wouldn't be an option in his eyes, he'd basically tell the owner it's too dangerous to stay.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.