Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Kretzschmaria - infected tree management ?


johnanderton
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 30
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

I'm lacking understanding about removing loads of energy producing foliage - to reduce loading, then expecting the tree to have energy to both grow and defend itself against the pathogen.

 

Forget the health and long term damage to the tree and think about reducing the risks in the short term. :001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Forget the health and long term damage to the tree and think about reducing the risks in the short term. :001_smile:

 

Just a philosophical question, but should we be thinking more in tree time than human time.

 

Would it be wiser, rather than keeping a much reduced tree for a few more years, to fell and replace and have something getting established within that period?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a philosophical question, but should we be thinking more in tree time than human time.

 

Would it be wiser, rather than keeping a much reduced tree for a few more years, to fell and replace and have something getting established within that period?

 

Imo Yes.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Imo Yes.

 

:thumbup: We've some common ground.

 

Sometimes I think there is too short a view on tree cover management, we're dealing with something that lives for hundreds of years but approach it with a 'here and now' mentality.

 

We wouldn't have what we have today without the foresight of the planners and landscape architects of the past, I wonder what we are actually going to leave for the future? If architecture is anything to go by, not much.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"I'm lacking understanding about removing loads of energy producing foliage - to reduce loading, then expecting the tree to have energy to both grow and defend itself against the pathogen."

 

Shift your focus from quantity removed (irrelevant) to quality retained (all that matters.)

Much foliage is redundant and unproductive. When leaves shade leaves that shade leaves etc., removing some is beneficial.

It all requires water for them all to stay alive.

CODIT is nourished by resources beyond our ken.

 

How much sunlight can be harvested, with minimal strain on the circulatory system, is the question.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

  • 8 months later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.