Before & After

[Bren.]

You sacked him because of the flack you got on here?

And then put the blame on those who didn't agree with you?

Jeez..........

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

Can't believe this got edited by the mods. I replaced most of the letters with dots.

I've seen worse on here.

[David Humphries]

Can't believe this got edited by the mods. I replaced most of the letters with dots.

I've seen worse on here.

 

Try reading the forum rules

 

We try and keep on top of them to keep the site running smoothly

 

Rule 2 applies here

 

http://arbtalk.co.uk/index.php?pageid=forumrules

 

.

[Dr.Green]

Unlucky. I once had a ball hammer go thru my old chipper. Was hidden in some privet hedgerow. A Grands worth of parts later it was fixed. Total headache

 

Luckily your tw is ok.

[kevinjohnsonmbe]

he is a subbie....... which means he isnt an employee which means he cant take me to a tribunal

 

 

There's been quite a lot in the news and reviews recently about zero hours contracts.

 

And there's always plenty of debate on here about what actually constitutes a "subby."

 

There seems to be a contradiction then. If he is a subby, you haven't sacked him, you're just not engaging his services any more.

 

So is he (a) a subby that you use once, twice, thrice a month, or is he (b) the bloke that comes with you every day, every week and doesn't have any other work streams but you call him a subby so as to avoid PAYE & employees liability insurance?

 

I hope it doesn't blow up on you!

[Bren.]

Sorry David, I did completely understand why, just wanted it understood that I had referred to the OP using a term that required you to edit it.

" Never hide behind yer mothers skirts" as me old mum used to say when I shouted abuse at a bunch of skinheads.

[Bren.]

There's been quite a lot in the news and reviews recently about zero hours contracts.

 

And there's always plenty of debate on here about what actually constitutes a "subby."

 

There seems to be a contradiction then. If he is a subby, you haven't sacked him, you're just not engaging his services any more.

 

So is he (a) a subby that you use once, twice, thrice a month, or is he (b) the bloke that comes with you every day, every week and doesn't have any other work streams but you call him a subby so as to avoid PAYE & employees liability insurance?

 

 

I hope it doesn't blow up on you!

From the sounds of it .......b.

[Stubby]

That would it explain it.

 

Of course, if you could see into the future, you probably wouldn't have started this thread....

 

And won the lotto by now

[chris23a]

I would agree with most of the views expressed here, docking his wages is unfair and probably illegal. If he really is as bad as you say then either terminating his employment or cancelling his service as a sub contractor is the only real solution here.

[peatff]

Try reading the forum rules

 

We try and keep on top of them to keep the site running smoothly

 

Rule 2 applies here

 

Arbtalk.co.uk - Forum Rules

 

.

 

That's shot that is

[Bren.]

Strictly speaking I didn't break the letter of the rules, but probably the spirit.