Tesco going down what do you all think thanks

[Tree Lc]

When it says that they are 'going down' what does that really mean?? 1 million less profit ? Don't quote me back on figures, as that is just an expression.

Do you remember years ago when M$S nearly folded and look at them now.

Although....Woolworths....

Tree LC

Horsham Tree Specialist

[mendiplogs]

When it says that they are 'going down' what does that really mean?? 1 million less profit ? Don't quote me back on figures, as that is just an expression.

Do you remember years ago when M$S nearly folded and look at them now.

Although....Woolworths....

Tree LC

Horsham Tree Specialist

 

Hi TC great to see TESCO GOING DOWN MATE THANKS JON

[peatff]

Hi TC great to see TESCO GOING DOWN MATE THANKS JON

 

Schadenfreude Jon ! I'm not a particularly big fan of theirs but they are one of the largest employers in our neck of the woods, a lot of people would be a lot worse off if they shut.

[luftwaffe]

Only a fool would right off Tesco, their share price has risen over 40% in the last 2 months. Good money has been made by some.

[mendiplogs]

Only a fool would right off Tesco, their share price has risen over 40% in the last 2 months. Good money has been made by some.

 

Hi mate not by your average man Thanks John

[luftwaffe]

Hi mate not by your average man Thanks John

 

Hi jon, don't put yourself down, the stock market is available to everyone, you gain the same gains as any hedge fund that operates in the square mile, and its so easy to by shares in this day and age, only takes about 1 minute or less and costs as low as £5.

[mendiplogs]

Hi jon, don't put yourself down, the stock market is available to everyone, you gain the same gains as any hedge fund that operates in the square mile, and its so easy to by shares in this day and age, only takes about 1 minute or less and costs as low as £5.

 

Hi WAFFE not for me mate thanks Jon

[scraggs]

The only people who would suffer are the people employed by them and indirectly employed by them, it wouldn't even remotely effect those at the top.

[mendiplogs]

The only people who would suffer are the people employed by them and indirectly employed by them, it wouldn't even remotely effect those at the top.

 

HI KEIGHT your right mate as they would not get there money thanks jon

[eggsarascal]

HI KEIGHT your right mate as they would not get there money thanks jon

 

So, what's the point in wanting them to go under then? Would it not be better,for all the people that they employ directly and indirectly if they kept trading (fairly). Rather than having suppliers pants down.