Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Does anyone know what tree this is?


Vwk9
 Share

Recommended Posts

I'd say Acer davidii cultivar of some kind, there's a big variation in leaf size/shape with the various cultivars

 

yep, so would I. What is the trees context? Acer distylum is not a commonly encountered snakebark maple, normally found in specialist collections. But may be wrong.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 48
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

A client once told me that he Usesed Google to search for information about his trees and is soon directed to......Arbtalk.

 

Its a forum where the members are, Tree Surgeons, "arbs", Contractors etc that Can not even perform the fundamental task for anyone involved with trees, Identification!

 

Granted, not an easy tree to ID, I was also struggling and undecided to begin with, but Hornbeam? Even a decent Groundie should have been able to glance sideways at those initial pictures and know immediately that this tree could never be HORNBEAM.

 

The OP then posed a pic of the whole tree and the Horbeam ID"s continue, however one guy was "not convinced" but he was convinced that it was Not A. Davidii but failed to see the correct arrangement of the leaves!

 

The thread then degenerates further because fools have been exposed, but the fools now want to pass the buck and blame the "critics" for spoiling their guessing game and frightening them into not posting any more "outer space" suggestions?

 

A post has been removed for being "usual nonsense", disappointingly I didn't get the chance to read it, how bad it must have beet to get pulled when all that misinformation is allowed to remain???

 

Cleary, we are living in the age of the "Google Wit", Google allows these self proclaimed "Arbs" et al the ability to quote the specific gravity of a jar of jam, but they lack the ability to get the lid off.

 

Jonny

Link to comment
Share on other sites

A client once told me that he Usesed Google to search for information about his trees and is soon directed to......Arbtalk.

 

Its a forum where the members are, Tree Surgeons, "arbs", Contractors etc that Can not even perform the fundamental task for anyone involved with trees, Identification!

 

Granted, not an easy tree to ID, I was also struggling and undecided to begin with, but Hornbeam? Even a decent Groundie should have been able to glance sideways at those initial pictures and know immediately that this tree could never be HORNBEAM.

 

The OP then posed a pic of the whole tree and the Horbeam ID"s continue, however one guy was "not convinced" but he was convinced that it was Not A. Davidii but failed to see the correct arrangement of the leaves!

 

The thread then degenerates further because fools have been exposed, but the fools now want to pass the buck and blame the "critics" for spoiling their guessing game and frightening them into not posting any more "outer space" suggestions?

 

A post has been removed for being "usual nonsense", disappointingly I didn't get the chance to read it, how bad it must have beet to get pulled when all that misinformation is allowed to remain???

 

Cleary, we are living in the age of the "Google Wit", Google allows these self proclaimed "Arbs" et al the ability to quote the specific gravity of a jar of jam, but they lack the ability to get the lid off.

 

Jonny

 

I did not offer an opinion simply because I did not know , and still don't . Has it been resolved conclusively ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Stubby

That is exactly why I did not attempt to ID it, because I wasn't sure, I was umming and arring so didn't dare through embarrassment, as the saying goes " its better to be thoight of as a half-wit than open ones mouth and remove the doudt..

 

It was far easier to eliminate candidates, like Oak and erm, Hornbeam

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Chill out Mr Vine. I had a stab at it seeing the photo on my phone. I was clearly wrong but I don't mind...and I haven't had any angry message from the OP so I don't think too much damage has been done during this discussion.

 

This is a forum, not a reference library or technical service.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hi Stubby

That is exactly why I did not attempt to ID it, because I wasn't sure, I was umming and arring so didn't dare through embarrassment, as the saying goes " its better to be thoight of as a half-wit than open ones mouth and remove the doudt..

 

It was far easier to eliminate candidates, like Oak and erm, Hornbeam

 

I'd be more embarrassed about not being able to spell. :001_tt2:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.