Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Holding back the years.........


David Humphries
 Share

Recommended Posts

Not functioning in that they can be worked again, but functioning in that they exist as a niche provider for the flora & fauna that reside specifically on living trees (lichens/moss,inverts,fungi etc...) as opposed to the specific niche habitat that dead standing or fallen trees provide which is what will eventually happen to the dead beech pollards. (as opposed to dead oak pollards, which stand for many, many decades)

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

Thanks for answering that concisely:thumbup:

 

Again, you have the best job:biggrin:

 

Sent using Arbtalk Mobile App

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 107
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Its amazing how many meters from the target a 'wideangled lens' can add :001_rolleyes: (let alone pounds) :biggrin:

 

 

 

.

.

 

LOL, your legs look like twigs that winter jacket doesnt help! Too much pen pushing not enough lunging in the woods!

 

too many Banana ales in the Monken holt!:lol:

 

Im just being anal about it, revising at the moment, and with the BS3998 bit regarding this matter fresh in my mind was just an observation. It wouldnt have made it more difficult to do that in two or three in a more controlled manner, thats all.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

"Good machine for that particular environment

Though it doesn't substitute getting up close and personal with the old ents"

 

Nothing ever could beat the literal hands-on experience.

 

Felt slippers are far too scuffy; barefootin' is the only natural way, dontcha know...

Link to comment
Share on other sites

LOL, your legs look like twigs that winter jacket doesnt help! Too much pen pushing not enough lunging in the woods!

 

too many Banana ales in the Monken holt!:lol:

 

Im just being anal about it, revising at the moment, and with the BS3998 bit regarding this matter fresh in my mind was just an observation. It wouldnt have made it more difficult to do that in two or three in a more controlled manner, thats all.

 

i wonder where that approach stands in the hierarchy of risk?

more cuts = more tree time + rigging forces + potential for injury

 

then lets not forget the increased footfall around retained trees from rigging operations potential cambiam damage from rigging device attached to tree.......

 

i could go on

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.