Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Picus sonic Tomograph


Xerxses
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 75
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

It has been said, very logically so, that to accurately assess a picus test you must know what decay fungi is present.

I am now wondering, if no fruit body is present how do you know? Surely invasive sample taking and lab id would not be feasible? Also, what of colonization by more than one species of fungi, perhaps with only fbs of one present? Is it safe to assume and base results on one being present, if you don't know something else isn't also in there?

Any ideas welcomed! Thanks

Link to comment
Share on other sites

It has been said, very logically so, that to accurately assess a picus test you must know what decay fungi is present. if no fruit body is present how do you know? Surely invasive sample taking and lab id would not be feasible? Also, what of colonization by more than one species of fungi, perhaps with only fbs of one present? Is it safe to assume and base results on one being present, if you don't know something else isn't also in there?

 

Sloth,

Why use any type of more or less invasive instrument, if there are no signs of decay by any fungus - with or without FB's - present or visible in the body language of the tree itself ?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

But what if there are signs of hollowing, eg bottle butt, fibre buckling etc, but no fbs? Or only fbs of one fungus, when, unknown, more than one may be causing decay?

 

- Fibre buckling is a mechanical phenomenon, i.e. is not caused by fungi.

- Shell or bark buckling caused by simultaneous white rotters (life belt, love handles) differs from shell buckling caused by brown rotters (horizontal and vertical bark cracks or creases).

- Vertical sheer or spiral cracks are mostly associated with Ganoderma species and Fomes fomentarius.

- Bark sinking on the trunk is mostly caused by Phellinus or Inonotus species.

- Bark and cambium necrosis causing fungi can often be recognised by the characteristics of their cankers.

- If there are signs of hollowing, you don't need to know the cause to determine the (remaining) wood quality or strength and stability of the tree.

- Tomography can not assess woodrot below ground level, so it's not suited for identifying and diagnosing woodrot caused by wood degrading pathogens such as Meripilus giganteus, K. deusta, Pholiota squarrosa, Gymnopilus junonius, Collybia fusipes, etc. at and below ground level.

- For the rest, you'll have to assess and monitor the body language of the tree and have knowledge of and experience with the outer signs of fungus-tree species specific interactions and how they effect the stability of the tree.

- The last question can not be answered by using any type of instrument, i.e. can only be answered after the tree has been felled and the necrotrophic parasitic or saprotrophic macrofungi start panic fruiting or the territorial bounderies of the more than one species and the types of woodrot become visible.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

- Fibre buckling is a mechanical phenomenon, i.e. is not caused by fungi.

- Shell or bark buckling caused by simultaneous white rotters (life belt, love handles) differs from shell buckling caused by brown rotters (horizontal and vertical bark cracks or creases).

- Vertical sheer or spiral cracks are mostly associated with Ganoderma species and Fomes fomentarius.

- Bark sinking on the trunk is mostly caused by Phellinus or Inonotus species.

- Bark and cambium necrosis causing fungi can often be recognised by the characteristics of their cankers.

- If there are signs of hollowing, you don't need to know the cause to determine the (remaining) wood quality or strength and stability of the tree.

- Tomography can not assess woodrot below ground level, so it's not suited for identifying and diagnosing woodrot caused by wood degrading pathogens such as Meripilus giganteus, K. deusta, Pholiota squarrosa, Gymnopilus junonius, Collybia fusipes, etc. at and below ground level.

- For the rest, you'll have to assess and monitor the body language of the tree and have knowledge of and experience with the outer signs of fungus-tree species specific interactions and how they effect the stability of the tree.

- The last question can not be answered by using any type of instrument, i.e. can only be answered after the tree has been felled and the necrotrophic parasitic or saprotrophic macrofungi start panic fruiting or the territorial bounderies of the more than one species and the types of woodrot become visible.

 

Well that sums it up! Thank you :thumbup:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Totally agree, especially "- If there are signs of hollowing, you don't need to know the cause to determine the (remaining) wood quality or strength and stability of the tree.", but isn't there some variation based on region and species to consider?

 

Plus, the role of resonance/acoustic testing by sounding with a mallet should be part of the process. First tool out of my bag, after or during the first eyeballing.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

1. Totally agree, especially "- If there are signs of hollowing, you don't need to know the cause to determine the (remaining) wood quality or strength and stability of the tree.", but isn't there some variation based on region and species to consider?

2. Plus, the role of resonance/acoustic testing by sounding with a mallet should be part of the process.

 

1. Standard basic VTA-procedure without assessment and integration of fungus-tree species specific interactions and effects on the stability of the tree in the diagnosis.

2. Along with the use of a bodkin or a longer cavity probe, also standard basic VTA-procedure, the subject of this thread is "Picus sonic Tomograph".

Edited by Fungus
Link to comment
Share on other sites

2. Along with the use of a bodkin or a longer cavity probe, also standard basic VTA-procedure, the subject of this thread is "Picus sonic Tomograph".

 

I don't mind, this thread has evolved rather nicely!:001_smile:

Interesting information and discussion.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.