Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

sick looking conifer/ llelandii


travis
 Share

Recommended Posts

my inlaws have a few of these trees in their front garden, even the tree officer didn't manage to identify them.

i have previously removed one tree a while back, now another of the trees is scabby looking.

can any one help out with either a diagnosis or a good enough reason for the local tree officer to have this tree removed.

i have taken a photo, there are two trunks growing very close but not joined. one trunk looks healthy and bushy, the other is very sparse, wilty and woody.

P1000622.jpg.eec34a808d75d233fc37091170cc92ae.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

ahh, i was a bit confusing. the local planning are not enforcing the removal, the home owner is looking for a legitimate reason for removal.

I also forgot to mention that the roots have been trimmed as they had interferred with the mains sewer!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

get me a pic of the leaves/needles/scales up close, and i mean up close, macro if you can:biggrin: and a pic of the spray (bits at the end of branches) and i will tell you what it is, but from that pic alone it could be anything!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

ahh, i was a bit confusing. the local planning are not enforcing the removal, the home owner is looking for a legitimate reason for removal.

I also forgot to mention that the roots have been trimmed as they had interferred with the mains sewer!

 

 

I think you have answered your own question.

 

lawsoniana as Rover suggests is probably the right answer, either that or the other Leylandii parent the nootkatensis.

 

I presume this is in a CA? If so, the TO will probably not be bothered either way what is wrong with it but tell him about the roots being trimmed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

If those cones/fruit on the branch are spiky its a Xanthocyparis nootkatensis or the Nootka cypress, If the cones/fruit aren't spiky its a Chamaecyparis pisifera cultivar, which one i couldn't say.

 

Gut says go with the nootka, and if it is it could be the 'pendula' variety which looks like this and would have nothing wrong with it.

 

If it wasn't it could be a number of things, nootka are apparently susceptible to aphid, honey fungus and phytophthara problems

 

hope that helps a bit

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.