Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
Excellent. Thanks! Know anything about vee-belt transmissions and why they're suitable for tow-behind chippers?

 

Just thought I'd chance asking! :confused1:

 

If I may,

 

Vee belt transmissions are widely used in engineering, they are relatively cheap, low maintenance and compact. They are light and also offer the ability to introduce gearing into the drive.

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

v-belts cope better to fluctuations in load than chain or gear or chain drives. also dont need lubrication or slip/overload clutches. weigh less and relatively inexpensive

Posted
a bit more info please:thumbup1:

 

Engine output speeds tend to be in the 2700 to 3000 rpm range, your chipper wants to be doing about 1000rpm so the output shaft gets a pulley about 2/3rds the size of the flywheel input shaft pulley which gives you an appropriate speed.

 

Gearing on the cheap and light doing the same thing with a gearbox would be cumbersome and heaaaavy

Posted

They will slip (and ruin the belts) if they aren’t tensioned properly.

 

If properly installed between an engine and a flywheel there should be enough transmission to stall the engine

Posted
They will slip (and ruin the belts) if they aren’t tensioned properly.

 

If properly installed between an engine and a flywheel there should be enough transmission to stall the engine

 

Mine has 5 V belts that are tensioned with a sprung loaded tensioner, if I put through a piece of 9" Oak without stopping and starting the rollers, the belts just disintegrate and the engine rev's don't even drop.

Posted
Mine has 5 V belts that are tensioned with a sprung loaded tensioner, if I put through a piece of 9" Oak without stopping and starting the rollers, the belts just disintegrate and the engine rev's don't even drop.

 

I have a 9" chipper being driven a 245hp unmog

 

As a rule of thumb 10hp per inch is adequate

 

Modern machines with stress control can get away with a lot less.

 

So 245hp less, lets say 45(for the sake of round numbers) in mechanical loss through the gearbox leaves you with about 200hp at the output shaft. Your chipper could get away with half of that.

 

Power is nothing without control.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.