Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
I did my 4 year apprenticeship with locomotors building specialist vehicles. We would not have built a vehicle like that on that chassis. If you look at the first picture who in their right mind would put that sort of weight on a 2mm box section 150mm x 75mm . That kit would have been put on something like a 7 tonne renault chassis or by todays standard a mit canter. :confused1:

 

Its a bit more than a 2mm box section, as it has strengthening bits and pieces internally.

chassis_inside_4AP_PakWheels(com).jpg.f63b6b437d1b8d3d742f1e9b705149d3.jpg

:001_smile:

Posted
The design hasn't but has the origin and quality of the steel?

 

I wonder about the quality of steel too; its well known that steel does vary. HOwever it also made sense to me about the rigidity of the lift set up making the chassis too rigid, and the stresses that would have transferred throughout the chassis become focused on one spot.

Posted
Not sure Kev, whats happened?

 

my 1894 110 chassis is made from better steel than the later ones i have worked on many many LRs welding and the like and IMO the chassis have become more like tissue paper the younger they get ! its a shame as the chassis and the bulkheads are the two itewms that let LR down on longevity ! Like it has been said how much of these faliurs are down to point loadings, poor fore thought of design and mountings, reduction of flex, and poor operator training when setting up the lift as said in the article its possible that continued force could be put on the chassis via poor judgement in deployment of the stabiliser legs etc !

Posted

A percentage of new steel is now recycled but they struggle to get silicons out. If you buy a galv trailer check the plating is not peeling off or discoloured. Also check the chassis is not twisted as they heat them so hard now to make the galv stick.

Posted

A company I used to sub for would keep standard springs on the Landrover hoists they used, the drive was sloppy as hell but they kept them standard to prevent the chassis breaking.

Posted
Its a bit more than a 2mm box section, as it has strengthening bits and pieces internally.

[ATTACH]57345[/ATTACH]

:001_smile:

 

some rust a hand full of left over nuts and bolts a ballot paper and a betting slip Solihulls finest :biggrin:

Posted

hmmm looks bad this but id expect it to be due to crap build quality and overloading etc. My series 1 1955 has a well thick chassis and so has hardly had any welding done in the last 50 odd years and i have had 3 1988 ish 110s that had spot on thickish but not as thick as the series 1 chassis. But then again my dads old series 3 rotted like mad as there was a bad batch of steel in some of them so.....anyones guess! but i agree that the newer ones are nowhere near as hardy as was the original idea.....shelf life i imagine. :thumbdown:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.