Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Terrible news about the Amazon


John Russell
 Share

Recommended Posts

The problem is that there are so many lies told, that its impossible to know the truth, for years we were told that an area of rain forest the size of Wales was being destroyed every day, yet all the rainforest's of the world are not 365 times bigger than Wales, so if it had been true there would be none left.

 

We were told areas where oil tankers went down would be barren wastes for 100's of years, but in reality they are back to normal within a few years.

 

I feel that the "green" thing is a new form of religion, it helps the decadent rich feel they have done penance for their greed and self indulgence and the government use it as a way to get more power, telling people the reason for some action it to save the planet.

 

I heard a very interesting argument that suggested human caused global warming may have actually saved mankind. The first actions by man that could have started this was 10,000 years ago, when the chinese started flooding paddy fields, which cause vegetation to decompose, releasing methane, then following that there has been clearance burning and the industrialization of many civilizations, its possible that without this we would have entered an ice age, wiping us all out.

 

But then I also heard that when Mount Saint Helena (sp) blow it released more GW gasses than the whole of the industrial revaluation and every car that has ever been built.

Edited by skyhuck
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 27
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

IMO a lot of the problem with perceptions of environmental problems is caused by the BBC and others striving to give a 'balanced' view.

 

If 90% of scientists believe 'x' and 10% of scientists believe 'y' they give equal time and weight to a representative from each camp.:confused1:

 

The problem is that this is actually unbalanced as the impression is given that half think x and half think y - when the truth is that 90% believe y.

 

All this obsession with being 'fair' and pc results in bigger problems within society.:thumbdown:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

The problem is that there are so many lies told, that its impossible to know the truth, for years we were told that an area of rain forest the size of Wales was being destroyed every day, yet all the rainforest's of the world are not 365 times bigger than Wales, so if it had been true there would be none left.

 

I think you'll find that the quote, more accurately, was "an area of rain forest the size of Wales was being destroyed every year".

 

Deforestation is a major issue and I don't think many people think it's a lie.

 

This is a... [ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=g7gpAy4ivZ0]Greenpeace film about the Amazon [/ame]

It explains that expiration by trees puts moisture in the air and creates rainfall. As the trees are cut down and the land is turned over to corn and soy growing the amount of moisture in the air drops and thus results in drought.

 

Best wishes,

 

JR

Link to comment
Share on other sites

the user comment at the bottom probably sums up my feelings pretty well

 

'So, when in two years the Amazon has returned to nominal, if not optimal conditions, will Scientific American produce a follow-up article stating as much? No.

 

By that time this magazine will have produced 150 to 300 more articles predicting the demise of just about everything else. And no one will have remembered this story. '

 

:biggrin:

 

I was thinking along the same lines.

 

Figured that over 100,000 years, this back-to-back drought or disaster thing has happened plenty of times.

 

Reminds me of a show I saw the past month or two, about how one of the deserts - maybe the Sahara, forget the name - sort of becomes like a lake again, then goes back to barren again.

 

Mankind's biggest problem is trying to spend money fighting climate change, when its super-slow and almost certain. And it would literally bankrupt all of us if we tried to preserve every lake, mountain, river and valley in the same condition perpetually.

 

Our real problems may be avoiding fast climate change if its something we are causing and reverse. But the slow multi-millenium changes is probably something we need to adapt to.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.