Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Hi all, as a youngen I was just wondering if anyone would turn down a worker just because they don't have a pre/97 licence. I understand the benifits of having one, but it seems a bit unfair for someone of my age trying to get into the game as i've seen a few jobs advertised stating that a pre97 licence is an advantage?? :confused1:

 

Many Thanks Ollie

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 38
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Depends on the firm, if you already have a hat full of guys in the firm that passed after 97 it becomes a bit awkward, and maybe then yes it will be difficult to gain a job. Good luck anyhow.

Posted

Is it that unfair? There is a school of thought that says it is right and proper that the age group most likely to have a crash should be kept out of larger vehicles.

 

Since there isn’t anything you can do about the pre 97 aspect or your age perhaps concentrating on what you can do something about?

 

First thing would be a trailer test, most companies run 3.500kg vehicles (transit size). Do a trailer test and you make yourself much more useful.

Posted

Thanks I didn't mean it to be a rant! just wanted to know the best the way to make yourself more on par with someone that has one. The trailer test seems to be the best best.

 

Many thanks

Posted

just as an asisde doing both your class 1 and 2 LGV (HGV) still doesent give yout he trailer entitlemnet on your car license ! stupid i know but my friend did both class 1 and 2 and still had to do the trailer test for his lisence aswell stupid government ideas !

Posted

It depends on the job you are going for. If the job is one that includes driving then yes you need a pre 97 (or trailer test) plus you need to be old enough to be insured on vehicles at a reasonable cost.

 

I think too many people think that a groundsmans job is to work on the ground under a tree and a climbers job is to climb the trees. There is far more to employment with a tree company than that, and one of the main responsibilities is to drive expensive machinery from one place to another.

 

So if a firm is lacking in drivers then it is completly fair to require a pre 97 employee.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.