Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

I wonder how many people wouldn't give a second thought to topping a leylandii but think its wrong to top a tree?

 

We are all hypocrites sometimes when it suits.

 

I should know since I am one!:001_smile:

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 106
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

I wouldn't top leylandii specimen tree. I would however reduce a hedgerow for maintenance purposes because as we all know that closely planted leylandii that are left to grow go very leggy and elongated searching for light and become weaker and more likely to snap big pieces out the top.

Posted

Taking the height out of a tree for light purposes is a joke. Either thin, and open pockets of blue sky to produce dappled shade or remove tree and replace with something of correct species for the correct spot.

Posted

I think your right with some trees in that its pointless to reduce and I do try and persuade a thin a lot of the time rather than a reduction but if it was reduce or fell then I would say a reduction is better most of the time. Otherwise we would loose a lot of large native trees.

Posted

We have many so called reductions round here that have now got ten times thicker crown than they had before the "reduction". The crowns are now, in only a few years, back to the original size and much much denser on the periphery, made up of straight poled fast growing epicormic.

 

Well done to those that did em, at least you have money in your wallet and the client a worse problem than they had before.

 

Comparing a leylandii topping is desperate

Posted

Comparing a leylandii topping is desperate

 

How come?

 

Topping a leylandii is the same as say topping a syc,ash,oak etc. It produces the same impact ie more light instantly but as you say causes further problems later on, quicker denser growth and weaker growing points.

 

Besides I've seen more leylandii's fail due to topping than I have with hardwoods.

 

I'm not saying heavy reductions/toppings are a wonderful idea but it can be better than felling and replanting. They do require regular 'topping' pruning etc but thats the customers problem and as long as its been explained then I feel its ok.

 

In an ideal world we would all have massive gardens with untouched trees and no jobs:001_tongue:

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.