Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Would you call it topping? Redwood


mdvaden
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 23
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

cable bracing only admits there is a problem, you are only slowing the failure down.

 

cabling is only going to go against you in court if you failed to reduce the load at the same time. cabling does admit a fault, but reducing the load and cabling is the right way to go from a liability point of view.

 

I don't think that cabling would be viewed any differently than pruning in the eyes of the law. Doesn't specifying/undertaking remedial pruning works admit the presence of a fault? Both seek to mitigate the liklihood of failure - just in different ways. As you say Hama, a combination is preferrable but I'd say that was in terms of preventing a failure rather than dodging liability.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that cabling would be viewed any differently than pruning in the eyes of the law. Doesn't specifying/undertaking remedial pruning works admit the presence of a fault? Both seek to mitigate the liklihood of failure - just in different ways. As you say Hama, a combination is preferrable but I'd say that was in terms of preventing a failure rather than dodging liability.

 

Check it out Tony!:001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that cabling would be viewed any differently than pruning in the eyes of the law. Doesn't specifying/undertaking remedial pruning works admit the presence of a fault? Both seek to mitigate the liklihood of failure - just in different ways. As you say Hama, a combination is preferrable but I'd say that was in terms of preventing a failure rather than dodging liability.

 

 

Its the nature of this fault, see if it was a single cable to a twin stem, the claimants expert may claim "that one had not taken into acount the barn door or side loading potential" and hence by reducing the lever arm you relieve that argument.:001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Indeed, my rather dull point was a general one and not really aimed at Mario's dilemma. You're quite right of course, a single cable prevents the included union from bursting open from incremental growth and gravity but not from a side load. :)

 

There look, I've agreed with you - it happens to everyone once! :D

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I don't think that cabling would be viewed any differently than pruning in the eyes of the law. Doesn't specifying/undertaking remedial pruning works admit the presence of a fault? Both seek to mitigate the liklihood of failure - just in different ways. As you say Hama, a combination is preferrable but I'd say that was in terms of preventing a failure rather than dodging liability.

 

IME, pruning is a way of sorting some sort of failure or hazard as pruning out a dead branch or section mitigates the hazard as you remove it, but bracing the same section would be pointless, as you know it will come down at some point, so why hold it up there when it can just be brought down and forgotten about

Link to comment
Share on other sites

IME, pruning is a way of sorting some sort of failure or hazard as pruning out a dead branch or section mitigates the hazard as you remove it, but bracing the same section would be pointless, as you know it will come down at some point, so why hold it up there when it can just be brought down and forgotten about

 

Just making sure we are following the context that eventual cabling won't be added above the damage to a weakened remnant, but below it on the main leaders, after the damage remnant is cut off the top of one stem.

codominant_redwd2.jpg.fe844b2e0d407c28cfb73c17e3909a61.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just making sure we are following the context that eventual cabling won't be added above the damage to a weakened remnant, but below it on the main leaders, after the damage remnant is cut off the top of one stem.

 

Thats about the best move you can make as far as i am concernd, the other (unpruned) leader should then dominate and take over.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.