Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Lidar uses in Arboriculture.


colemanjessenz
 Share

Recommended Posts

Hey everyone,

For those who don't know me, I’m Jesse Coleman, and I run a company based in New Zealand. We’ve recently acquired a LiDAR unit and have begun exploring its potential. Initially, we aimed to use it for data acquisition, estimation, and presentations for larger-scale helicopter work. However, we've been so impressed with the technology and its results that we're now incorporating it into our day-to-day services.

I’d love to hear from those of you who are already using this tech. Where have you found it to be game-changing? Whether it's tree inventories, site scanning, harvest models, or something else, I’m interested to hear more about how you're utilising LiDAR and where you see its future heading.

Looking forward to your insights.

 

  • Like 3
Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

I see it being used in topograpic surveys for development sites (DTMs). A colleague fantasises about it being able to mark the posiitons and measure the heights. crown spreads and stem diameters of all the trees on  a site, but I'm not sure it's realistic or cost effective (yet). I got someone to use it in my previous job to create a 3D model of a town centre I was working on.

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

On 21/08/2024 at 06:24, daltontrees said:

I see it being used in topograpic surveys for development sites (DTMs). A colleague fantasises about it being able to mark the posiitons and measure the heights. crown spreads and stem diameters of all the trees on  a site, but I'm not sure it's realistic or cost effective (yet). I got someone to use it in my previous job to create a 3D model of a town centre I was working on.

Hey Jules, yes that's a great way to use the tech. 

what your college is thinking about  is actually what I've been using it for. I have been testing this on a big block of pine trees that are scoped to be heli lifted out (I will attach some photos of how it can be presented).

I worked with a local company to compile this data into something useable for us... there were limits as some of the stems weren't completely picked up by the first scan but we have since gone back and have corrected these with a more thorough scan.

 

I can share these as the data on this one isn't exact. 

scanning parks would be much easier as there's a huge amount of free space around the trees and the canopies are more defined.

IMG_1691.thumb.PNG.5d3bb9b0332e5b041d5f9fd37884e6eb.PNG

IMG_1688.PNG

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, daltontrees said:

Can it really determine diameter to 1mm precision and height to 0.1m?

No, we aren't there yet Jules haha.

I don't think anything out there is that precise. It is however accurate to 4cm on vertical and 5 cm for horizontal.

 

The measurements above are what has been extracted from the point cloud, these measurements fall under those accuracy parameters that I described above. There are multiple other factors that can alter those measurements and that's to do with the clarity of the point cloud and how its processed.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Mark Bolam said:

That’s still mentally accurate Jesse!

 

How does the weight calculation work?

Surely that would fluctuate seasonally?

 

Hey Mark, With Pinus radiata it’s pretty consistent. Our green weight for this species has been used frequently in the last three years.  It’s a specific type of growth and situation which makes them a different weight to a regular forestry pine.  Spring time we would expect to see a small bump up in weight but we have buffers which account for this anyway. 
 

with Mac’s Its still 50/50 if it’s going to be bone dry and light as a match stick or way too heavy 😂 

  • Haha 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

I haven't checked the coverage of all of the UK but the EA (Environment Agency) has LIDAR surveyed England as far as I know. Data is freely available I think but I haven't checked. I use the results (via a contractor) to get height estimates on a 3x3m grid of many of the sites I attend. It's useful but not infallible. Without a topo it can provide a slope profile of the site. It doesn't measure individual trees, it measures what it finds (so one tree with a large crown may produce more than one estimate). Since I visit the sites with the LIDAR analysis I can check tree heights against those shown. If the ground is flat that helps. If it is sloping be warned there can be discrepancies. Winter (leafless) v summer (in leaf) also can lead to issues.

 

For general scanning of tree height over significant areas and inaccessible/difficult to access rear gardens of hostile neighbours it can fill in missing gaps of info.

 

As for the cost of a useful product, that's dependent on the supplier.

  • Like 2
Link to comment
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Jon Heuch said:

I haven't checked the coverage of all of the UK but the EA (Environment Agency) has LIDAR surveyed England as far as I know. Data is freely available I think but I haven't checked. I use the results (via a contractor) to get height estimates on a 3x3m grid of many of the sites I attend. It's useful but not infallible. Without a topo it can provide a slope profile of the site. It doesn't measure individual trees, it measures what it finds (so one tree with a large crown may produce more than one estimate). Since I visit the sites with the LIDAR analysis I can check tree heights against those shown. If the ground is flat that helps. If it is sloping be warned there can be discrepancies. Winter (leafless) v summer (in leaf) also can lead to issues.

 

For general scanning of tree height over significant areas and inaccessible/difficult to access rear gardens of hostile neighbours it can fill in missing gaps of info.

 

As for the cost of a useful product, that's dependent on the supplier.

We have a national lidar database also but it has the same issues as you described above. I have worked on a tender that used this to pick out trees for a runway clearance.  The deciduous trees were off by anywhere up to five meters as the method of scanning wasn’t picking up on the apical buds but rebounding off bigger branches lower down.  It wasn’t as useful as what they hoped it would be. 
 

the lidar database is accurate to a meter or two (off the top of my head) which is alright for some things but it doesn’t have the accuracy and reliability needed for more specific tasks. It is however a fantastic tool to have available to use as you’ve described above. 
 

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.