Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted (edited)

I bought this wee baby Tirfor last year, only used it really today, it was just the thing for pulling well dead and dry spruce out. Trees were light, in fairness, but a fair bit of friction involved aloft. It's so light and small, no excuse not to bring it along for all jobs. Was €208 delivered from "MTN Shop".

https://youtu.be/F9WAMn8fGz4

View full article

Edited by Haironyourchest
  • Like 1

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
9 minutes ago, Haironyourchest said:

I bought this wee baby Tirfor last year, only used it really today, it was just the thing for pulling well dead and dry dead spruce out. Trees were light, in fairness, but a fair bit of friction involved aloft. It's so light and small, no excuse not to bring it along for and all jobs. Was €208 delivered from "MTN Shop".

https://youtu.be/F9WAMn8fGz4

 

View full article

 

It looks like you have that winch set up backwards?

  • Like 1
Posted

Yup it's backwards. Get the cable hook as high up the anchor tree as I can reach so the pull angle creates a mild lift. Keeps the butt of the tree from digging in. Also saves walking back and forth from the tree when I need to de-clutch the Tirfor to run the cable out for the next pull.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)

I'd thought about a longer handle. I believe the unit would take the extra force before the shear pin goes. Yale has a slightly different 500kg model - the upmarket version - which has a much longer telescopic handle. So far, the short handle has been ok, didn't feel the need for more pull. I should try and lift 500kg with the short handle and see if it works, if not, then I will modify the handle.

Edited by Haironyourchest
Posted

Oh I see. Wouldn't be too bothered about having to bend down, sure half the work is bending down for one reason or another anyway. Longer handle = slower pulling, so what you gain in ease you lose in time. It's nice to have options though, hence a telescopic is always preferred.

Posted
1 hour ago, Haironyourchest said:

Oh I see. Wouldn't be too bothered about having to bend down, sure half the work is bending down for one reason or another anyway. Longer handle = slower pulling, so what you gain in ease you lose in time. It's nice to have options though, hence a telescopic is always preferred.

You could just put a pulley on the anchor tree and increase the mechanical advantage by nearly double, twice as less strain on the handle.

  • Like 2
Posted
You could just put a pulley on the anchor tree and increase the mechanical advantage by nearly double, twice as less strain on the handle.
Twice as less... ?? Is that proper english language? [emoji12]
  • Like 1
  • Haha 1

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.