Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Unseasoned prices


Somerset Sam
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

6 minutes ago, Woodworks said:

Not dry but we cut our logs smaller than many and this makes each cube a bit lighter and they also dry faster so win win in my book. Ignore how long it takes re-splitting all the oversized logs coming off the conveyor haha

Smaller logs, smaller air gaps, less m3/tonne - but yes, we do a LOT! of resplitting as drying time is always a bain.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, arboriculturist said:

Smaller logs, smaller air gaps, less m3/tonne - but yes, we do a LOT! of resplitting as drying time is always a bain.

Try weighing the crates. Small logs are lighter for sure. Take it to the extreme and fill one with kindling and its about as heavy as jay cloth haha 

  • Like 1
Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Woodworks said:

Try weighing the crates. Small logs are lighter for sure. Take it to the extreme and fill one with kindling and its about as heavy as jay cloth haha 

You find an crate 8" logs is lighter than the same crate of 12" logs when dried for the same amount of time, Ok, you may have weighed the 2 whereas I have not.

but you will get far less m3 per tonne processing 8" as opposed to 12".

Link to comment
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, arboriculturist said:

You find an crate 8" logs is lighter than the same crate of 12" logs when dried for the same amount of time, Ok, you may have weighed the 2 whereas I have not.

but you will get far less m3 per tonne processing 8" as opposed to 12".

I was talking about how chunky they are not the length. Our 12" logs all get stacked  so dont know their weight just the shorter ones in crates

Link to comment
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, Woodworks said:

I was talking about how chunky they are not the length. Our 12" logs all get stacked  so dont know their weight just the shorter ones in crates

I wouldn't be surprised if split and stacked 12" hardwood worked out better than cordwood as some bends would be eliminated but generally the smaller you comminute something the lower the bulk density.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, openspaceman said:

I wouldn't be surprised if split and stacked 12" hardwood worked out better than cordwood as some bends would be eliminated but generally the smaller you comminute something the lower the bulk density.

So the smaller you split the firewood the less weight you would have per m3 - provided they had both been allowed to dry to the same MC?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.