Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Can any trainers / assessors give a definitive answer on whether un-certificated staff are allowed to undertake aerial work under direct supervision of certified & experienced staff? I have not heard of this before, but I saw it mentioned on a training company's website - and it stated it  was a "legal" and acceptable way for new staff to get experience & time off the ground.

Any clarification / caution of grey areas much appreciated - thanks

 

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

We have diploma students come out for work based training, you must be with them all the time, never get too relaxed and leave them on their own, also never ask them to do anything beyond their comfort zone.

  • Like 1
Posted (edited)
5 hours ago, stihlmadasever said:

Yip,2 climbers,1 trainee,1 experienced

Is that 2 climbers, 1 experienced and 1 trainee. Or 2 climbers and the trainee.

If it is 1 climber and trainee and both are climbing you will need someone capable of aerial rescue to rescue the experienced climber if required....  But I guess it is OK if the experienced climber is just supervising and not actually climbing..

Edited by benedmonds
Posted
53 minutes ago, benedmonds said:

Is that 2 climbers, 1 experienced and 1 trainee. Or 2 climbers and the trainee.

If it is 1 climber and trainee and both are climbing you will need someone capable of aerial rescue to rescue the experienced climber if required....  But I guess it is OK if the experienced climber is just supervising and not actually climbing..

Climb trees and perform arerial rescue used to be a pre-requisite for CS39. Regardless, I wouldn't let an inexperienced climber use a saw in the tree if they couldn't rescue a)themselves or b) someone else. 
Is there a need for seperate aerial rescue if two climbers are in the tree?

Posted
59 minutes ago, stihlmadasever said:

1 trainee climber

1 experienced climber

1+ 1= 2

Did you really ask me that when i said that in my first post?

Quote

2 climbers,1 trainee,1 experienced

  is ambiguous. It could have been read 2 climbers + 1 trainee.. 2+1=3 

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, benedmonds said:

  is ambiguous. It could have been read 2 climbers + 1 trainee.. 2+1=3 

But its not and it isnt.

How can 2 climbers,1 trainee

1 experienced be interpreted as 3?

2 or maybe even 4 i could see

but 3??

 

 

Edited by stihlmadasever

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.