Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

CS50 - Techniques For Dealing With Damaged Trees


bob
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Agreed on the Windblow overlap......

 

It seems very much weighted towards the assumption that the tree is to be felled.

 

Admitedly, there is a small portion regarding branch removal/hung up branches, but i get the impression that it's moreso from the perspective of working from the ground.

 

Considering the cs34/cs35 overlap, it seems a bit pointless IMO.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Is there any difference between CS50 and 34, 35 ?

It appears to be the same procedures. Any way how do you define a damaged tree. There are not many trees around that do not have some sort of damage, and thet will out last us all.

rant rant rant !

 

but you dont have to have cs 32 for this unit or 34 or ua1

as there all covered :confused1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

look at the small print of cs50.... the tree size is limited, this qual is amid , as it has already been said at working soley from the ground, and soley on smaller trees, where risk is less than very big things in the middle of the woods.

 

the addition of the assisted fell is a requirment of the QCF (government stuff) and it is arguably subtley differant from UA2.2 as in UA2.2 the rope is to prevent the tree falling back on to power lines, in cs50 it is part of an assisted fell, so pressure to pull the tree over will be needed.

 

to be honest all assessors had a chance to comment on variouse eliments of these new quals, but there are all sorts of bits that they are not happy with, but some bits forced through for many resons.

 

CS50 was designed innitially to address some eliments of the QCF, to address some feed back from innisial 2 consultations, and to address, a very significant sector, that was putting teams at risk and avoiding 32,34,35 as allegidly it did not affect them. namley the hunders of highway guys out there who get a cs 30, may be 31 and then have there bosses send them out in storm situations to get rid of 'small ' dangerouse trees over highways.

 

now its not perfect, nothing in life is, well except my wife??? but as i understand it does meet what it needed to do.

 

only time will tell if it is a runner or a chocolate tea pot

 

cheers

 

kev

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think it was kevin (Arbocop) or maybe the lady in the office that said most firms require us to take refresher courses, so you might as well take a new course this counts as a refresher on chainsaws and you are adding to your tickets. If you are like me you may not need them but i may loose my job and then they all come in very handy on the CV. Whats a CV i am only a country bumpkin:001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.