Potus ???

[peds]

[peds]

In other news, things like this are... interesting...

 

[GarethM]

2 minutes ago, peds said:

In other news, things like this are... interesting...

 

Atleast before the internet, this sort of sh1t posting was reserved for those sandwich board or speaking in tongue types.

 

I suppose becoming a priest was similar thing, telling them about fire and damnation instead of trawling the depths of the internet for his daily fix of internet dross whilst claiming the CIA was stealing his thoughts and how velcro/bubble wrap and soft loo roll was his idea.

[sime42]

Any thoughts on the Signal debacle or Trump  tariffs on the UK Gareth? Are they worse or better than Biden's son being a Coke Head?

 

 

[tree-fancier123]

14 minutes ago, GarethM said:

Atleast before the internet, this sort of sh1t posting was reserved for those sandwich board or speaking in tongue types.

 

I suppose becoming a priest was similar thing, telling them about fire and damnation instead of trawling the depths of the internet for his daily fix of internet dross whilst claiming the CIA was stealing his thoughts and how velcro/bubble wrap and soft loo roll was his idea.

what he posted could well be evidence of election fraud - why are you so sure it's not?

You or I don't have any idea about it, let's be honest

[GarethM]

Personally I think the signal thing might be an attempt at disinformation, it's got everyone talking and spending on defense.

 

Tariffs are much of a muchness in the longer term, they're there to make a level playing field, unless you're china subsidising every industry to demolish ours.

 

Let them sell whatever they wish, it's down to the consumer what they actually buy. Sell your hummer, if nobody buys it then it's not our problem if the price is attractive.

 

I'm still wondering why the coke head went off to south Africa, even tho it was his gas business acumen elsewhere or paintings.

[GarethM]

2 minutes ago, tree-fancier123 said:

what he posted could well be evidence of election fraud - why are you so sure it's not?

You or I don't have any idea about it, let's be honest

No, it just shows like every other election.

 

They vote for the leader they like, but locally the person they trust. As per any local elections here, you vote for the councillor not the useless party they are from.

 

No fraud just reality of they didn't like Kamala.

[tree-fancier123]

4 minutes ago, GarethM said:

No, it just shows like every other election.

 

They vote for the leader they like, but locally the person they trust. As per any local elections here, you vote for the councillor not the useless party they are from.

 

No fraud just reality of they didn't like Kamala.

that is only what you think, your interpretation, you make it sound like it is impossible or very unlikely that any fraud took place

Personally I vote for the party and not the leader, at the last election I voted Conservative and would have done if it was Rishi, Boris, or even Liz

[GarethM]

9 minutes ago, tree-fancier123 said:

that is only what you think, your interpretation, you make it sound like it is impossible or very unlikely that any fraud took place

Personally I vote for the party and not the leader, at the last election I voted Conservative and would have done if it was Rishi, Boris, or even Liz

There is your problem, you've fallen into the lifelong voter trap they rely upon.

 

The UK system, excluding labour as they have a different conference structure. You elect the party and they choose the leader, hence why they can be ousted and replaced.

 

The Americans have several layers, hence those voter figures. And regardless of the media, Americans didn't like Kamala but liked the party.

 

Whilst you could argue there should have been a few of the 500 votes from say the senators staff, I don't know if they're barred.

Edited Friday at 12:39 by GarethM

[tree-fancier123]

someone is trying to pull the wool, pretending they know about something they don't