Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Next POTUS?  

50 members have voted

  1. 1. Next POTUS?

    • Hillary Clinton
      21
    • Donald Trump
      29


Recommended Posts

Posted
57 minutes ago, GarethM said:

And if you're failing to say I'm inbred, atleast I have toes. Yours are just one webbed mass of inbreeding 

Genetic muckup, perhaps. I have no opinion on whether you send your sister Mother's day cards. 

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted
1 hour ago, sime42 said:

What are your living arrangements @GarethM? I did pose the question at least once before, but you declined to answer.

 

 

 

More than 500 yards from a school if his attitude to child rapes is anything to go by.

Posted
6 minutes ago, Steven P said:

More than 500 yards from a school if his attitude to child rapes is anything to go by.

I'm not the one obsessively throwing around the unsubstantiated rape allegations against Epstein, with little more than hearsay.

 

Or your unwaivering defense of anyone visiting our shores who enjoys a bit of that sort of thing, because they've not been told not too.

 

You're probably banging a placard outside an army base with your purple hair shouting it's not good enough for these visitors they can have my spare back bedroom, oh wait they'll be an excuse.

Posted (edited)
24 minutes ago, GarethM said:

I'm not the one obsessively throwing around the unsubstantiated rape allegations against Epstein, with little more than hearsay.

 

 

Are you an apologist for a convicted nonce? 
Or are you unaware of his crimes?

 It's interesting that those on the right of the politcal spectrum, who want to protect women, don't seem to bat an eyelid when a foreign, sex pest, and known associate of Epstien flies over to hobnob with the royals. 

Edited by Mark J
  • Like 1
Posted
6 minutes ago, Mark J said:

Are you an apologist for a convicted nonce? 
Or were you unaware of his crimes?

 

And what's the first word of that phone book of wordage "alleged".

 

No conviction, exactly the same with Jimmy.

You're little legal eagle should be able to explain that very important distinction!.

 

You can't convict a dead man, granted you can hang, drawn and quarter them but legally they can be convicted as they can't defend themselves.

Posted
7 minutes ago, GarethM said:

And what's the first word of that phone book of wordage "alleged".

 

No conviction, exactly the same with Jimmy.

You're little legal eagle should be able to explain that very important distinction!.

 

You can't convict a dead man, granted you can hang, drawn and quarter them but legally they can be convicted as they can't defend themselves.

I think you should give it a rest. You are making yourself look like an apologist for paedophillia. 

Take your mindset and stick it up your arse. 

Off you trot.
 

  • Like 2
Posted

Likewise there was no conviction for Saville... Epstein was convicted of soliciting a minor for sex. That means paying a child to have sex with her. Not alleged, convicted. Maxwell was convicted of suppling children for Epstein to have sex with. Not alleged, convicted.

 

And in defence of Epstein, GarethM.

  • Like 1
Posted
7 minutes ago, Steven P said:

Likewise there was no conviction for Saville... Epstein was convicted of soliciting a minor for sex. That means paying a child to have sex with her. Not alleged, convicted. Maxwell was convicted of suppling children for Epstein to have sex with. Not alleged, convicted.

 

And in defence of Epstein, GarethM.

Soliciting isn't rape is it, maybe your legal training ended on the first day of work experience.

 

Akin to a sting operation on TV where they arrest the guy for giving money to an undercover cop posing as a prostitute.

 

But like that attorney general, wasn't he a "Solicitor" until he wasn't.

 

It's not defense, it's as you like to keep inferring words have meaning.

 

And you're level of calling him a rapist is beyond obsessive, I don't vote for the labour and their legalise child love party, or MAP as they wanted it calling.

Posted
7 minutes ago, GarethM said:

Soliciting isn't rape is it, maybe your legal training ended on the first day of work experience.

 

Akin to a sting operation on TV where they arrest the guy for giving money to an undercover cop posing as a prostitute.

 

But like that attorney general, wasn't he a "Solicitor" until he wasn't.

 

It's not defense, it's as you like to keep inferring words have meaning.

 

And you're level of calling him a rapist is beyond obsessive, I don't vote for the labour and their legalise child love party, or MAP as they wanted it calling.

You should quit while you're behind. 

  • Like 1
Posted
9 minutes ago, Mark J said:

You should quit while you're behind. 

From a man that barely understands the meaning of terror...ist.

 

Me thinks you're barking up the wrong tree.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.