Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Chilcot, Weapons of Mass Deception


Billhook
 Share

Recommended Posts

'Weapon of mass deception': Tony Blair and the Chilcot inquiry - how newspapers in Britain and around the world reacted

 

I wrote the only letter I have ever written to the press after it was announced that the Americans had put up a $20 million reward for Saddam Hussein dead or alive, just as though it was some Western movie.

 

My letter went something like

 

"if I found Saddam lurking in my shrubbery and shot him dead because I assumed he had weapons of my destruction on him, would I be able to claim the $20 million reward or would I end up like Tony Martin"

 

My point being that if we were legally at war I would be legally able to shoot him

but if as I suspect we were not legally at war I would be in prison.

 

They never printed the letter

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

I fought in both gulf wars and it felt very awkward. We have to trust our politicians to make the right decisions - but it is very difficult to fully support something which you have trouble in believing in. I think that the first Gulf war was actually the first of probably many 'Resource Wars', and had more to do with the control of oil than the threat of Mass Destruction? Maybe I'm just cynical?

SG:001_rolleyes:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I fought in both gulf wars and it felt very awkward. We have to trust our politicians to make the right decisions - but it is very difficult to fully support something which you have trouble in believing in. I think that the first Gulf war was actually the first of probably many 'Resource Wars', and had more to do with the control of oil than the threat of Mass Destruction? Maybe I'm just cynical?

SG:001_rolleyes:

 

I think when Saddam invaded Kuwait it was morally right to push him out. However I think Gulf War round 2 was about America wildly lashing out after being attacked by Obama bin Laden.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I think when Saddam invaded Kuwait it was morally right to push him out. However I think Gulf War round 2 was about America wildly lashing out after being attacked by Obama bin Laden.[/

It was, but was it really our business? Kuwait and Saudi are VERY rich countries, which along with Iraq control a vast amount of the worlds oil reserves. Who do you think funded the war? American Forces received extra payment. British forces did not receive any extra money as we would then have been perceived as 'Mercenaries'. We did get 'water money' which was about 7 Riyals a day if I remember right. A bit odd really as there was nowhere to spend it and we had plenty of water! We only see fit to police the rest of the world when it is of direct interest to us?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.