Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Best mini digger?


csservices
 Share

Recommended Posts

Was looking upto 7.5k, he wanted £6500 for the kubota, £5950 on the Volvo and £7200 on the Terex, spoke to another place in way back and I'm waiting to hear back from thier finance people with regard to looking at a newer Takeuchi 016

 

When I was on the hunt for a mini digger I started off with a 6-7k budget but found in that price range there was just too much junk. Everything was 10 year old, thousands of hours amd battered. I upped my budget to 10k and was able to look at 3 year old, 500 hour, like new models. I reckon it is well worth spending the extra. In 3 years I think it'll still be worth £8k-9k.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 78
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Just a snippet of information on a very long overdue change on the extremely popular size Kubota U27-4.

This machine is finally available with factory twin dual action auxiliary circuits making attachment fitment easy with what should be great control without interruption of other functions.

It's took a bit of digging to find, but they also do a bolt on folding track pedal kit that is fitted to the larger machines for this model.

A couple of seemingly minor points that make a massive difference to the operating experience and production over the lifetime of the machine.

I await my demo shortly, but if I had to take the Volvo Ecr25D today it's certainly a great machine too.

 

 

Eddie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

When I was on the hunt for a mini digger I started off with a 6-7k budget but found in that price range there was just too much junk. Everything was 10 year old, thousands of hours amd battered. I upped my budget to 10k and was able to look at 3 year old, 500 hour, like new models. I reckon it is well worth spending the extra. In 3 years I think it'll still be worth £8k-9k.

 

 

Yes a few grand gets a consierably better machine, my first TB016 I got for £8k with 1400 hours in near enough perfect condition, I put a thousand hours on it over 3 years and sold it on losing only a £2k, it cost me £2 an hour! fuel and servicing was about £1.50 an hour and it cost me nothing in repairs over 3 years, proper money earner.

 

I think if i was buying a used 1.5tonner now i would set my budget at £10k, IMO this will get you a really decent machine. if you spend anymore than this than you'd probably be better of buying brand new with the benefits of warranty etc. I,d sooner finance a good machine than buy a banger out right.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Hmmm - I knew I shouldn't have used this thread - sorry CSS.

 

Mathew - can you remind me what size hammer you are running (and if you used it on the TB016).

 

Ta

 

The pictures i posted above are on a 2.8 tonner, that postdriver has a 180 kg weight and i would not want more on it! A 1.5t would barely lift the machine as it weighs 350kg all in. When i had my TB016 i had a lighter built postdriver with a 100kg hammer weight. You could work with it on pretty steep ground.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Just a snippet of information on a very long overdue change on the extremely popular size Kubota U27-4.

This machine is finally available with factory twin dual action auxiliary circuits making attachment fitment easy with what should be great control without interruption of other functions.

It's took a bit of digging to find, but they also do a bolt on folding track pedal kit that is fitted to the larger machines for this model.

A couple of seemingly minor points that make a massive difference to the operating experience and production over the lifetime of the machine.

I await my demo shortly, but if I had to take the Volvo Ecr25D today it's certainly a great machine too.

 

 

Eddie.

 

 

How would you compare a zero tail swing compared to standard on a 2.8 ton machine. I've never used one but was watching one on site the other day and I thought it looked a bit jumpy on the back track compared to my standard one. Isn't the track base wider on zero swingers?

Link to comment
Share on other sites

How would you compare a zero tail swing compared to standard on a 2.8 ton machine. I've never used one but was watching one on site the other day and I thought it looked a bit jumpy on the back track compared to my standard one. Isn't the track base wider on zero swingers?

 

Yes obviously a bit of compromise to be had, and they generally have wider track frames to help redress the balance, but obviously in this class they can't go much more than 100mm wider over standard or the machines can't get in the tight spots.

Some offer additional counterweight that then sticks out the back, and in the worst instances people stack these and end up with a big lump of weight hanging out that gives more tailswing than a traditional machine?

 

I would just prefer the zero swing option for the bits and pieces I have in mind, hopefully less susceptible to damage and able to work in tight spots.

 

 

 

Eddie.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.