Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

No danger!


simonm
 Share

Recommended Posts

The tree is growing on the edge of a public footpath and overhangs a residential property, apparently the council have come out and said "its not in any imminent danger" :confused1: but if they want that and another removed they will have to find a contractor to do it for them. Im i wrong in thinking that as it is on council land they should be responsible for managing their own trees? is this another case of the LA trying to save more money :sneaky2:

59766cc80fee0_WP_20150329_0021.jpg.dd9a20d3f8c8a2b3f03516e5217fc27b.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

This is the only photo i have, i could agree with what your saying if the la were committed to inspections on a regular cycle however i doubt this is happening as i know for a fact the la has 1 tree officer that is stretched so far he cannot keep up with work flow. Try telling a home owner to pay for any work on a tree that is not theirs is like pissing in the wind, its within falling distance of their house and they are worried about letting their young son in their garden incase it fails :thumbdown: in an ideal world where money doesn't exist and the cost to retain such a tree is not an issue would be a great place to live, however down to its condition & location i am all up for removal.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

its an oak probaly been like that for donkeys yrs & will prob stat that way for many yrs to come . , looks like anchaint fire damage by past land owner ,

 

yeah probably...would you chance it next to your house.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

yep, seriously,

The fact that I work for a LA and am constantly badgered/harassased by selfish silly home owners or renters who apparently want to live in the middle of a cotton padded desert without any dangerous (=all) trees, dropping twigs or leaves in their gardens or gutters, or harbouring man-killing rats, is entirely beside the point.

despite living on junk food, smoking and driving like idiots.

i.e. activities much more likely to be injurious to they or their children health.

m

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.