Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
Could well be - as far as I know, Stihl pay royalties to Husky for the use of the early AT technology in the M-tronic.

 

I was gonna say - there's likely a reason they are the same...

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 35
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
I was gonna say - there's likely a reason they are the same...

 

 

It's a well known fact, and Stihl don't deny it, I believe it may be added to the 880 soon, judging by the advert tag in my local dealer today, and heated handles! Or Stihl may have sent a tag with a typo, but it had no mention of 2-mix

Posted
And there ends the first lesson on autotune carbs, great when they run but not to great when they don't :thumbdown:

 

Steve . Do you think it would be possible to fit a non A/T carb to say ...a 560 ? Drill the appropriate holes in the top cover for the H , L , and T screws ?

Posted
And there ends the first lesson on autotune carbs, great when they run but not to great when they don't :thumbdown:

 

The evidense I have seen so far tells that it always is the carb that is faulty, not the AT, at least with the Husky AT saws. :wink:

Posted
Steve . Do you think it would be possible to fit a non A/T carb to say ...a 560 ? Drill the appropriate holes in the top cover for the H , L , and T screws ?

 

Anything is possible, you would need to modify linkages etc, one of the big problems would be the transfer tubes and their connection and the other is how the autotune adjusts ignition timing and idle speed, it would be quite a project finding a coil to fit and get the timing set correctly.

 

A big project I would say having just converted my 066 red eye to another coil!

Posted
The evidense I have seen so far tells that it always is the carb that is faulty, not the AT, at least with the Husky AT saws. :wink:

 

 

Well, they are zama carbs... Something known for a faulty design

Posted (edited)
Well, they are zama carbs... Something known for a faulty design

 

Yep, I don't think it was a good Idea to leave the design of a new kind of carb to Zama.

 

I assume you know who currently owns Zama, not that I will suggest that has anything to do with it....:sneaky2:

Edited by SawTroll

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.