Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Such a shame these trees had to be felled, fencing them off would be more than sufficient, I have worked on these trees before and from a visual point of view they were no worse than any other tree I have ever climbed. Health and safety gone mad!!!

 

 

Sent using Arbtalk Mobile App

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 77
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted

Thanks for posting the link, it's appreciated :thumbup1:

 

 

Nice touch encouraging visitors to take a piece of the wood

 

 

Still feel it's disappointing that the option of not bringing it down over time (whilst new ones establish) was not given a go.

 

.

Posted
The scan image is different from the one you posted David. Perhaps a different scan from the same tree? Or perhaps they are totally unrelated?!

 

Imagine they are different positions from the same tree Paul

 

 

.

photo2.JPG.4e5d3c9d3119a1b33505b7c3c2dfdf6a.JPG

photo.JPG.b126179b6964ab005cca3a5b00415052.JPG

Posted

The tree had been tested by myself last year with the Picus tomograph and was shown to have significant decay present due to colonisation by Phaeolus.

This year both Mick Boddy and myself spent most of a day testing with the Tomograph and two resistographs just to be sure of the accuracy of our results.

We tested at several heights and found extensive levels of advanced tissue degradation.

The National trust considered all of the evidence and also asked Jeremy Barrell for an opinion.

Be it financial or H&S they took a decision to fell the tree.

We can all stand back and pass comment and be critical about anothers decision but the National Trust will have to carry the can in the event of a claim. I would like to have seen the tree kept following a reduction but I can understand the N T stance. We live in a world where litigation can influnece many decisions.

Posted
The tree had been tested by myself last year with the Picus tomograph and was shown to have significant decay present due to colonisation by Phaeolus.

This year both Mick Boddy and myself spent most of a day testing with the Tomograph and two resistographs just to be sure of the accuracy of our results.

We tested at several heights and found extensive levels of advanced tissue degradation.

The National trust considered all of the evidence and also asked Jeremy Barrell for an opinion.

Be it financial or H&S they took a decision to fell the tree.

We can all stand back and pass comment and be critical about anothers decision but the National Trust will have to carry the can in the event of a claim. I would like to have seen the tree kept following a reduction but I can understand the N T stance. We live in a world where litigation can influnece many decisions.

 

Thanks for pitching in, good to hear a version of events leading to the decision to fell straight from the horses mouth...

Posted
..........the National Trust will have to carry the can in the event of a claim. I would like to have seen the tree kept following a reduction but I can understand the N T stance. We live in a world where litigation can influnece many decisions.

 

Thanks for taking the time to put your experience of the situation across, much appreciated :thumbup1:

 

I find it very interesting that even after the outcomes of both the civil case and HSE investigation found in favour of the National Trust in the aftermath of the tragic Felbrigg Hall case, we still see large landscape and woodland trees (no matter their proven condition) felled (debatably) before their time, due to fear of claim when it's been proven that their inspection systems are robust enough to discharge their duty of care.

 

 

.

  • 3 weeks later...

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.