Stolen Timber

[geoff]

I think Skyhuck you and others may learn something from the link below providing that your view of the experts opinion isn't clouded by the media/gov lies/spin!

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/archives/29364

 

That research was carried out in one area, known for poor work prospects if I am reading it right.

That would not reflect the general traits for the whole country, in fact you could argue that to use it as a generic model for the whole of the uk might be a deliberate skew of the reality.

[egnsean]

That research was carried out in one area, known for poor work prospects if I am reading it right.

That would not reflect the general traits for the whole country, in fact you could argue that to use it as a generic model for the whole of the uk might be a deliberate skew of the reality.

 

there's is always an excuse for those that don't want to see!

also i note your location which may skew your view of the reality

Edited November 19, 2013 by egnsean

[skyhuck]

I think Skyhuck you and others may learn something from the link below providing that your view of the experts opinion isn't clouded by the media/gov lies/spin!

http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/politicsandpolicy/archives/29364

 

I don't base my opinion on media hype, unfortunately its based on long personal experience being around these people.

 

If there was research that told you grass was blue would you accept it?

[geoff]

there's is always an excuse for those that don't want to see!

 

Sure, I agree with you on that statement, but dispute the validity of the link as described in my last post, & hence find your post to be a little weak by way of response to my post, come on you can do better than that!

[egnsean]

I don't base my opinion on media hype, unfortunately its based on long personal experience being around these people.

 

If there was research that told you grass was blue would you accept it?

 

London School of Economics, part of the 'golden triangle' of British universities.

Good heavens No obviously a bunch of pure cowboys:001_tt2:

[egnsean]

Sure, I agree with you on that statement, but dispute the validity of the link as described in my last post, & hence find your post to be a little weak by way of response to my post, come on you can do better than that!

Thats an awful lot of words to say so little:laugh1:

[geoff]

there's is always an excuse for those that don't want to see!

also i note your location which may skew your view of the reality

 

I notice that you have added the last line in this post after I replied, smoke & mirrors?

 

Yes, as a straight up bloke I will admit that my location might well skew my opinion here, but my grip on reality is sound, as was my first post in this matter, to which you have found no response appertaining to it, other than observations of my person. Keep it third party, & on subject or it is pointless mate.

[geoff]

Thats an awful lot of words to say so little:laugh1:

 

Yep, I have a way with words, I need to use lots of them to make my point, ho hum.

[egnsean]

I notice that you have added the last line in this post after I replied, smoke & mirrors?

 

Yes, as a straight up bloke I will admit that my location might well skew my opinion here, but my grip on reality is sound, as was my first post in this matter, to which you have found no response appertaining to it, other than observations of my person. Keep it third party, & on subject or it is pointless mate.

Geoff, i don't get the feeling somehow that you are so sensitive that rule 4 needs to be invoked:biggrin:

[geoff]

Geoff, i don't get the feeling somehow that you are so sensitive that rule 4 needs to be invoked:biggrin:

 

You sir are a fair judge of character, & will not require rule 4 to be applied in this instance, as you are not actually calling me insensitive.

Even had you, I'm sure your position would have been judged a fair call by our minions!