Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Introduction Reduction


Matt_Oldfield
 Share

Recommended Posts

Log in or register to remove this advert

Hi all,

 

I'm not a fan of the pristine reduction, following the natural flow I find leaves the tree (for most species) looking like a tree and the characteristics are preserved.

As for bits sticking out, it's a tricky one. In some cases it works as above the character of the tree. But a balance between natural and ironed is the way forward.

You know you've got it spot on when you walk round after completion and you don't feel the desire to tip back that bit and you can't tell you've done a reduction bar the shrinking.

And remember the customer is NEVER right!! There only concerned with the sun light or there sky dish or the leaves.

 

Mike

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You say in one sentence leaving limbs protruding from the general crown profile is sloppy and unacceptable, then that you reduce each limb and equal amount.... Or am I getting confused?

 

I don't think there is a hard and fast rule, I'm a big fan of partial reductions by just tipping in over extended limbs to within the crown profile, this for me works best on trees like Cedar to help reduce those lever arms particularly in severe weather like heavy snow.

 

Sometimes I'll reduce and try to achieve a balanced and as close to symmetrical crown profile as possible.

 

And on other occasions I'll just reduce a tree equally so if one limbs sticks out it will still stick out as not all trees are perfectly shaped and symmetrical and this is what gives them character.

 

Most if my reductions have nothing to do with great shapes it's more duty of care and doing what I think is best even if I'm wrong. One thing is universal the customer is always wrong!

 

you nailed it I think mate .

 

 

Sent using Arbtalk Mobile App

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Click on my facebook link, i have added my latest reduction before and after side by side. This is my idea of a good reduction. (feel free to comment :001_tongue:)

 

We use bs3998 but they are GUIDELINES and unrealistic in every case. You have to use your common sense and cater to the customer and the tree, rarely does the tree complain as much as the customer ( the nail that sticks out gets hammered ). So we cater to the customer and offer advice but you cant force it on them.

 

No reduction is the best reduction, but we are employed because humans decide to plant big trees in tiny spaces. I love those stupid decisions because i get to work in great places.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share

  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.