Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted
What I find a bit odd about this whole thing is, well, everything.

Stihl as a manufacturer exist solely to sell equipment.

It's pretty obvious to anyone with a functioning brain of any capacity that restricting the purchasing options their customers have will hit their volume.

They sell their goods (allegedly) to all their dealers at the same nett price, so why would they care how these dealers shift them?

They don't mind whether 1 million dealers sell 1 saw each or 1 dealer sells a million saws.

In restricting their most successful volume selling dealers they set themselves at an unfair disadvantage to other manufacturers who don't adopt this policy.

This isn't about protecting dealers, I'd be surprised of this has even come from Stihl all by themselves, it smells like Europe to me...... Such a half baked business decision doesn't feel like the brainchild of the worlds largest selling saw manufacturer. They didn't get there by making it difficult to buy their products.

 

:thumbup: Well said!! :thumbup:

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 26
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted
Soooo, what is the reason behind this??? Anyone got any idea?

 

HI MATE to help the small sub dealers out shop local thats what stihl say it all :thumbdown::thumbdown::thumbdown::thumbdown:and large net dealers well no more time to see a very good lawyer if you run a large net base dealer :thumbdown:jon

Posted
I may have missed this comment on other threads but - I wonder what stihls efforts, comments and feed back they will have when pretty much everyone is going to be getting stuck in o them at the Arb show...

 

Glad I am not a stihl rep attending the AA show

I don't think they need to worry. I hear Stihl are now issuing their reps with new PPE:

http://images.google.com/search?site=&tbm=isch&source=hp&ei=joeqUdWlAYSsOri9gYgB&q=medieval+armour&oq=medieval+ar&gs_l=mobile-gws-hp.1.2.0l5.7247.18993.1.20550.11.0.11.0.4.0.0.0..0.0...0.0...1c.1.15.mobile-gws-hp.zax4zJ-QIGY&biw=320&bih=356&sei=uYeqUceyB4S2hAenuYGQDg

Posted (edited)
What I find a bit odd about this whole thing is, well, everything.

Stihl as a manufacturer exist solely to sell equipment.

It's pretty obvious to anyone with a functioning brain of any capacity that restricting the purchasing options their customers have will hit their volume.

They sell their goods (allegedly) to all their dealers at the same nett price, so why would they care how these dealers shift them?

They don't mind whether 1 million dealers sell 1 saw each or 1 dealer sells a million saws.

In restricting their most successful volume selling dealers they set themselves at an unfair disadvantage to other manufacturers who don't adopt this policy.

This isn't about protecting dealers, I'd be surprised of this has even come from Stihl all by themselves, it smells like Europe to me...... Such a half baked business decision doesn't feel like the brainchild of the worlds largest selling saw manufacturer. They didn't get there by making it difficult to buy their products.

 

If that was the case, wouldn't all the manufacturers have issued their new procedures by now, given that the compliance date seems to be 03/06/2013? Unless, of course, Stihl have decided to hog-tie their dealers before they have to? Either way, not a good business move on Stihl's part and one which is obviously peeing a lot of people off. :001_smile:

Edited by felixthelogchopper
Sausage fingers
Posted (edited)
If that was the case, wouldn't all the manufacturers have issued their new procedures by now, given that the compliance date seems to be 03/06/2013? Unless, of course, Stihl have decided to hog-tie their dealers before they have to? Either way, not a good business move on Stihl's part and one which is obviously peeing a lot of people off. :001_smile:

 

It does all seem very strange!

Who actually are the EU based manufacturers though?

Stihl, Dolly.... Efco I guess..... can't really think of any others of consequence.

But as the biggest it would make sense for Stihl to be ahead of any bonkers directive which will no doubt only be adhered to in the UK....

 

I sound like I'm Europe bashing here, I'm not, it just seems like such an obviously terrible commercial decision that it could only have come from the likes of them. Which granted, is a bit of Europe bashing, but indirectly! :001_tongue:

Edited by WorcsWuss

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.