Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Is solo climbing ever acceptable?


Hill-Billy
 Share

Recommended Posts

When does a hedge become a tree or a tree a hedge? I only ask because the other day I agreed to dismantle/remove a large multi-stemed Lelandii for a customer. My regular climber didn't get back to me in time for a quote I did and (with only a small time window between jobs) I ended up doing the removal/felling and topping with the help of the customer who acted as a groundie of sorts (he's actually a family friend).

The real question (at last!) is, at what point do you other tree surgeons feel the need for a second climber for aeriel rescue? Isn't Lellandi just a hybridised hedging plant and not (necessarily) so much a tree?

Who wants to turn this kind of 'bread and butter' work down because your oppo is unavailable that day?

What's the Public-Liabilty feel about this anyone??:confused1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 37
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

Top Posters In This Topic

Posted Images

When does a hedge become a tree or a tree a hedge? I only ask because the other day I agreed to dismantle/remove a large multi-stemed Lelandii for a customer. My regular climber didn't get back to me in time for a quote I did and (with only a small time window between jobs) I ended up doing the removal/felling and topping with the help of the customer who acted as a groundie of sorts (he's actually a family friend).

The real question (at last!) is, at what point do you other tree surgeons feel the need for a second climber for aeriel rescue? Isn't Lellandi just a hybridised hedging plant and not (necessarily) so much a tree?

Who wants to turn this kind of 'bread and butter' work down because your oppo is unavailable that day?

What's the Public-Liabilty feel about this anyone??:confused1:

 

Not sure what you mean with this last bit???:confused1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Common sense prevails. Simple.

 

Climbing alone? Take a mobile and ensure someone knows where you are.

 

In terms of public liability insurance (Skyhuck I presume this is what he means) then of course they wouldn't pay out for a claim whereby a qualified groundsman should of been present.

 

Insurance companies make sure you have ticked all the boxes you should of in the circumstances surrounding your accident. They certainly wont just write a cheque (I doubt) when under very simple rules and regulations you should have a qualified ''rescuer'' present (with all of the equipment needed to rescue.) (Work at height regs)

 

I think the answer is use your brain :001_smile:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Common sense prevails. Simple.

 

Climbing alone? Take a mobile and ensure someone knows where you are.

 

In terms of public liability insurance (Skyhuck I presume this is what he means) then of course they wouldn't pay out for a claim whereby a qualified groundsman should of been present.

Insurance companies make sure you have ticked all the boxes you should of in the circumstances surrounding your accident. They certainly wont just write a cheque (I doubt) when under very simple rules and regulations you should have a qualified ''rescuer'' present (with all of the equipment needed to rescue.) (Work at height regs)

 

I think the answer is use your brain :001_smile:

 

Pay out for what????:confused1:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Pay out for what????:confused1:

 

You had a drink? :lol:

 

A claim. Public liablity insurance?... Have I had a drink :confused1:

 

If he was climbing alone and had an accident his insurer would not pay out for his claim if he was breaching any rules or regulations, ie climbing without a qualified rescuer under work at height regulations.

 

The same as... If I crashed my vehicle and it had no MOT they wouldn't pay out for my claim as the vehicle wasn't conforming to rules and regulations.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

You had a drink? :lol:

 

A claim. Public liablity insurance?... Have I had a drink :confused1:

 

If he was climbing alone and had an accident his insurer would not pay out for his claim if he was breaching any rules or regulations, ie climbing without a qualified rescuer under work at height regulations.

 

The same as... If I crashed my vehicle and it had no MOT they wouldn't pay out for my claim as the vehicle wasn't conforming to rules and regulations.

 

But you make it sound like they won't pay out for an injury to the climber, which they won't under any circumstances, as thats not what PL is for.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.