Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

hi, just joined the forum have learned tonnes already. bought a hydraulic log splitter for the tractor a couple of years ago but have recently seen videos of the unicorn spiral log splitter. was just wondering which is better - unicorn seems to be much much faster but probably more dangerous to use. any thoughts greatly appreciated. thanks

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Hi welcome to the forum.

Might be worth having a search on the forum because I'm sure we discusses exactly this quite recently.

 

In my experience I've found the screw type splitters to be dangerous and unreliable, forever bending shafts. Hydraulic splitters are much more civilised! Certainly don't get rid of a hydraulic splitter for a screw type.

Posted

I'm afraid that I have to disagree, I got rid of a hydraulic one for a Hycrack quite a few years ago, and I think it's a far better machine. For a start, you can use an old tractor, anything from 25hp upwards as you are not relying on hydraulics. It might not be as quick as a hydraulic overall, but in certain woods it is actually quicker. One benefit is that, because your arms are not flailing about like a whirling dervish pushing and pulling levers, it is much less tiring.

 

There is no ring that it will not split, and if it does not get through, it's because you need a new tip. I have only had to replace one so far.

 

Myfirewoodsplitter3.jpg

Posted

many thanks for the info. i tried typing 'unicorn hydraulic log splitter' into the search box to find previous conversations on this subject but my thread seems to be the only one coming up.

Posted

Screw type splitters can grab the wood and throw it. Whatever is in the way gets damaged! We have a HP with a little screw splitter and I've used it twice. Both times in nearly broke my thumb! I'll stick to my hydraulic one!

Posted

Aye the unicorns are ok when the wood is seasoned but for if not it sometimes spins in the ring. Ive sold mine for a hydraulic as its safer and more efficient IMO

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.