Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Tree assessment/forest pathology


Recommended Posts

yes, i was just looking at it, it would seem to fit, it isnt dryadeus for sure.

 

so felling may not be needed, are there budget limitations here for defining the decay?

 

the tree looks to be adapting.

 

Hi,

Carried out a tomograph on the tree in 2010, some decay associated with bracket and area of flat bark, but not nearly enough to warrant removal. I have heard later ( thanks Gerrit ) that signs of selective delignification are not always picked up on diffuse porous trees.

Budget does not run to a pulling test unfortunately.

The tree has been dead-wooded twice in last 4 years.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 148
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

  • 4 weeks later...

So, they keep telling us oaks are resilient to armillaria, well they are no more resilient than any other healthy vital tree within good growing conditions.

 

This tree was dying back a fair bit one side, we went over to take out the deadwood and a little further back into healthier tissue. The client had asked for a reduction, we felt it was not prudent to do so at this time, we recommended the deadwood and monitor, i have also talked them into a mulch ring as large as they can tolerate. The idea being to adress the poor biodiversity of the soil and increase water retention. Then 12-18 months from now, if vitality is better we would consider a reduction.

 

I recognised the basal flare of I dryadeus, and eventualy found a discrete fruit body and last years old sporocarp absicion scar, these where very discrete and I had to really look to find them both.

 

P1120430.jpg.a0736052bc5d291c5e01dc91a4dad7b9.jpg

 

P1120446.jpg.6c11ba1300264e2f40d3a1306ed299f5.jpg

 

P1120437.jpg.fe3811adef39fc323ebc4c6b50e5cb72.jpg

 

P1120438.jpg.e3acff9cc866b0a5b800fbd29173d672.jpg

 

P1120440.jpg.3ca522eaa5c619ce9f4896a1a78733c7.jpg

 

P1120429.jpg.3f6ab5994444bfd97d95169e0edc41b0.jpg

 

P1120431.jpg.d6961d002f73992bb79311853700d53c.jpg

 

P1120445.jpg.febcb9805f8ac280bb800d86d36d2f8f.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

they keep telling us oaks are resilient to Armillaria, well they are no more resilient than any other healthy vital tree within good growing conditions.
smooth bark and Armillaria

 

Tony,

I can support your claim with about 50 photo's of Quercus robur not being resilient to Armillaria and reaction formation of smooth bark (callus) to (in vain) overgrow the damaged cambium.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.