Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

Got this reply to an application today??

untitled.JPG.29574f7a98bef0ade886af4e584ca156.JPG

 

The colour sketch plan is the one I sent first 59765a72497f7_17stkathrinesct.JPG.5f703ae98be2ef31e1104dd32a408406.JPG

 

This black and white is what they require.... but could not put the crosses on. Am I missing the point... or do they just want to waste my time?

59765a724bc09_stkathrines.jpg.35b839acb37f4747211c85b21e4a6e47.jpg

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

I think that in a way they arent really asking too much....although very nice, your colour plan isnt the clearest, and two red (for example) crosses in the black and white map would be very clear indeed, and the imperial thing, wel in a way that is to be expected.

Think yourself lucky.....the council down here wouldnt stoop to be nearly as helpful as your council have been....if it gets stuck in registration you dont get told!!!

Posted
did you put the amount to be removed as a percentage ben? because if you did, their reply makes no sense whatsoever:confused1:

 

I think Percentages have gone out of the window with BS3998 2010.:001_smile:

Posted
did you put the amount to be removed as a percentage ben? because if you did, their reply makes no sense whatsoever:confused1:

 

They are crappy conifers, a hedge really. I put the height above the ground they were to be cut too. I just don't understant why they could not have looked at the map and drawn on theirs, it is from the same data. As to using metric.. 1ft = 0.3m..

Posted
your colour plan isnt the clearest,

 

Think yourself lucky.....the council down here wouldnt stoop to be nearly as helpful as your council have been....if it gets stuck in registration you dont get told!!!

 

Tell me you cant see T1 and T2. The map is from their web site. The garden isless then 10x7m or 30x21ft..

Posted (edited)

Yes i can see them, but at first i missed them, and if your councils reg department are anything like the dept downhere, they will have missed them. The red circle put me off at first. You have to bear in mind that you are dealing with public servant underlings here......I dont mean to sound pedantic, but a recent app I submitted was thrown back at me for far more inane reasons than yours.....eg on the survey of the 28 trees, with a ARCGIS sub metre accurate plan, and detailed descriptions of works, final spreads etc ect, they rejected it because there was now final spread on 6 trees....even though it quite clearly stated that there was no action required on the survey on those trees!!!!!

Edited by tommer9

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.