Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

I have some oak butts about 24-30 in in diameter I have been offered £3 a hopus ft for them but by my calcs thats about what we paid for it as firewood. If we put the work in we would get more than that for firewood. Any ideas?

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

Andy fellows could go higher on the price I suspect if it is quality stuff with no metal in.

 

I'll PM you his phone number.

Posted
I have some oak butts about 24-30 in in diameter I have been offered £3 a hopus ft for them but by my calcs thats about what we paid for it as firewood. If we put the work in we would get more than that for firewood. Any ideas?

 

£3 / hft works out at about £80 / cu. m - that's expensive firewood.

 

Where I used to live, they'd get up to £8 / hft, but these would be at least 3 ft diameter + and 1st grade.

Posted
£3 / hft works out at about £80 / cu. m - that's expensive firewood.

 

Where I used to live, they'd get up to £8 / hft, but these would be at least 3 ft diameter + and 1st grade.

 

Buying in cordwood for firewood its not far off £80 a cu metre. A solid cu metre of oak will probably weigh more than a tonne and when cut and split will only weigh half a tonne.

59765a48522fc_logs115(450x600).jpg.291d8abe472efb6a677ba88e8b83212c.jpg

Posted

For good clean Oak, £3 a hoppus foot is much too cheap. For me, I would be happy to pay £6-7 a foot delivered to my yard, so perhaps £5-6 at road side.

Posted

Yes , I would pay £6 or £7 a hoppus ft for good woodland butts delivered to my Woodmizer. Less if it is a hedgerow tree as the chances of hitting metal are much higher and there will be more wastage.It would take under an hour to mill it.

If I have to travel to the log then realistically it is not going to take me less than half a day, probably longer to to mill and then get all the timber and the mill back home. I would not want to pay more than £4 and the further I have to travel the price would drop.

Posted

JPH - I'm not sure that it is as simple as that for hoppus. As far as memory serves, the hoppus measurement takes into account that larger logs have less waste in them than smaller pieces, so the value changes. I might be wrong though, and I'm feeling too idle to test my theory by working it out!

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.