Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

Recommended Posts

Posted

So, I am interested in a discussion on this method of hazard evaluation, but have not looked into it any more since my first dip of the toes and finding that the whole concept is based on buckles being the initial failure starter as apposed to Clause Matthecks theory on shear before buckle, he is right of course.:biggrin:

 

so can anyone tell me more about this conflict of theories, and more about the method of tree pulling?:001_cool:

Log in or register to remove this advert

Posted

I can certainly talk about pulling but not much about shear vs. buckling.

 

One thing to keep in mind is that that there is a huge issue of egos, hurt feelings and pride in the issue of Mattheck vs. the pulling guys.

Posted

unfortunately i do not know THAT part of the story, and hope to understand all sides of the argument.

 

so lets exclude the buckle shear equation for a moment (surprised you know about pulling theory without this basic knowledge? does this indicate a weakness in the training?)

Posted

The basic idea is that you pull such that you do not damage or weaken the tree. By measuring tilt of the root plate you never pull beyond a 0.25 degrees. Failure generally occurs between 2.5 and 4 degrees. When tensioning (or compressing) fibres a load of 1 to 2 tonnes (10 o 20 kn) is applied which is below the "specific elastic limit" of wood fibres.

Posted
The basic idea is that you pull such that you do not damage or weaken the tree. By measuring tilt of the root plate you never pull beyond a 0.25 degrees. Failure generally occurs between 2.5 and 4 degrees. When tensioning (or compressing) fibres a load of 1 to 2 tonnes (10 o 20 kn) is applied which is below the "specific elastic limit" of wood fibres.

 

How are defects manifested, during the pulling??

Posted
The basic idea is that you pull such that you do not damage or weaken the tree. By measuring tilt of the root plate you never pull beyond a 0.25 degrees. Failure generally occurs between 2.5 and 4 degrees. When tensioning (or compressing) fibres a load of 1 to 2 tonnes (10 o 20 kn) is applied which is below the "specific elastic limit" of wood fibres.

 

but this cannot apply to all wood fibres? or is that why a load of 1-2 tons is used, allowing a slight degree of genetic differences? or does all wood break at this stated elastic limit?

Posted

I have to go out but there is a variation in wood fibre strength, that is why there are tables for modulis of elasticity by species.

 

 

How are defects manifested during the pull? Well they are not really. The idea is that the trained and knowledgable assessor finds the areas of the tree that needs to be assessed for strength. Thus you will likely pull at the thinnest part of a shell around a hollow, or very near a defect and measure the reaction of the tree. The movements are so small they are measured with a micrometer.

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now

  •  

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

Articles

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.