Franks fungi hunting thread.

[Tony Croft aka hamadryad]

It was indeed my photo. I spotted the shot from quite a way away and felt that to be the best compostition. Heres the other 2 pics. No i cant name the fungi as Im out and about at the moment and nowhere near "my bible". Haha[ATTACH]58566[/ATTACH][ATTACH]58567[/ATTACH]

 

shaame on you frank! daedeleopsis confrogosa, AKA the blushing bracket:001_cool:

[Frank]

shaame on you frank! daedeleopsis confrogosa, AKA the blushing bracket:001_cool:

 

Cheers for the info. I am a true begginer. I thought there was mushrooms and toadstools and they grew in poop. My eyes are now wide open. I have a thirst.

[Tony Croft aka hamadryad]

Cheers for the info. I am a true begginer. I thought there was mushrooms and toadstools and they grew in poop. My eyes are now wide open. I have a thirst.

 

in years to come, through that thirst and from observations your view of the wooded world will be irreversibly changed.

 

Im glad youve found the pleasure, its so much fun.

[David Humphries]

Darren,

 

are you one of the 696 people that have so far accessed the AT directory specifically for the Daedaleopsis gallery

..................or perhaps not ?

 

 

interested to know either way ?

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

.

 

.

[RobArb]

monkey, not a criticism... but...

 

i love using the fungi directory but find it very hard to use, especially the search feature which is that what its for, searching fungi?

 

what i mean is when someone on here posts a pic of fung i try to find the name of it and first of all fgo to the gallery, then search by a-z, then try to find it by keywords describing that fungus, i have started noticing spelling mistakes which is why when i am searching for things that i know to be true, things don't pop up

 

(i have found words like bracket spelt braket, cinnamon spelt cinamon and a few others i would have to go back and check..

 

so don't get me wrong, it is NOT a criticism but i think if the search tool could be utilised better maybe more people would use it:blushing:

[David Humphries]

monkey, not a criticism... but...

 

i love using the fungi directory but find it very hard to use, especially the search feature which is that what its for, searching fungi?

 

what i mean is when someone on here posts a pic of fung i try to find the name of it and first of all fgo to the gallery, then search by a-z, then try to find it by keywords describing that fungus, i have started noticing spelling mistakes which is why when i am searching for things that i know to be true, things don't pop up

 

(i have found words like bracket spelt braket, cinnamon spelt cinamon and a few others i would have to go back and check..

 

so don't get me wrong, it is NOT a criticism but i think if the search tool could be utilised better maybe more people would use it:blushing:

 

 

 

Lets not mince the intent.

 

that is a fine peice of criticism, and I'm grateful for it.

 

Points taken onboard

 

 

 

out of interest Rob, have you tried viewing it through the David Humphries’s Gallery Hall

feature.

 

ftr, lots of people are using it, just check the numbers against the individual galleries.

 

But very few are leaving comments on them, good or bad

 

.

[RobArb]

i shall endeavour to comment:thumbup:

 

out of interest Rob, have you tried viewing it through the David Humphries’s Gallery Hall

feature.

 

 

I Haven't, no. Its not very clear where that is:blushing:

[Tony Croft aka hamadryad]

monkey, not a criticism... but...

 

i love using the fungi directory but find it very hard to use, especially the search feature which is that what its for, searching fungi?

 

what i mean is when someone on here posts a pic of fung i try to find the name of it and first of all fgo to the gallery, then search by a-z, then try to find it by keywords describing that fungus, i have started noticing spelling mistakes which is why when i am searching for things that i know to be true, things don't pop up

 

(i have found words like bracket spelt braket, cinnamon spelt cinamon and a few others i would have to go back and check..

 

so don't get me wrong, it is NOT a criticism but i think if the search tool could be utilised better maybe more people would use it:blushing:

 

im guilty too:blushing:

 

im trying to get the spellings right!

[RobArb]

haha. like i said, not a criticism but more of a critique... is that differetn??

 

we all know spelling is a lot of peoples downfall, mine included!

[bats-n-trees]

Don't ever worry about spelling.Far better to make a post from the heart about something you feel passionate/strongly about.We readers will forgive any spelling errors if you keep us spellbound with your thread. For without knowledge we are nothing.