Jump to content

Log in or register to remove this advert

V.T.A symptoms "the chatty trees"


Recommended Posts

I popped down yesterday and got some more shots of the tree. Got some funny looks when i was getting pics of the tree from various angles. And just to get everyones juices flowing another internal cavity shot.

 

What ya recon to this Tony? Our TO has said he would like to see the tree on the deck in the winter due to its "major structural weakness" caused by the internal cavity, the internal large bracket and bracket on the outside.

 

Needless to say it will be standing next winter and the winters after that, until it lets go on its own accord.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Log in or register to remove this advert

  • Replies 604
  • Created
  • Last Reply

Top Posters In This Topic

What ya recon to this Tony? Our TO has said he would like to see the tree on the deck in the winter due to its "major structural weakness" caused by the internal cavity, the internal large bracket and bracket on the outside.

 

Needless to say it will be standing next winter and the winters after that, until it lets go on its own accord.

 

Well matty without reduction its probably inevitable that a failure will occur, that is if she doesn't shed some weight, say if Laetiporus sulphureus was in the upper regions.

 

Or a well to do arby type gave her a tickle!:001_cool:

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Well matty without reduction its probably inevitable that a failure will occur, that is if she doesn't shed some weight, say if Laetiporus sulphureus was in the upper regions.

 

Or a well to do arby type gave her a tickle!:001_cool:

 

Will probably get an out of house tree surgeon in to do it. We have used a guy in the past to do reductions and thinnings. After the first growing season after the work you couldnt tell if the work had been done on a couple of them. How much do you think we could get away with out of the top?

 

We are thinking 2 metres all round with a 10% thin within the canopy.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Will probably get an out of house tree surgeon in to do it. We have used a guy in the past to do reductions and thinnings. After the first growing season after the work you couldnt tell if the work had been done on a couple of them. How much do you think we could get away with out of the top?

 

We are thinking 2 metres all round with a 10% thin within the canopy.

 

3-4 metres for a structural mod, and NO THINNING, naughty boy!

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Thats what the TO wants but he aint getting it :lol:. Just wanted to see what response it got when i mentioned the T word. If he hadn't seen the cavity with the big bracket in it he would say monitor annually.

 

heres a chatty oak, still cracks me up how they argue over t/r ratio theory.

 

natures rules!

 

597665c16f0bc_myrtle020.jpg.644a9fc3952d690959f06b7afd832ef3.jpg

 

597665c17226f_myrtle029.jpg.42ef27b201ba3cd51b62fda76c4f09e3.jpg

 

597665c174231_myrtle024.jpg.4b607bbdb804b8bf7c6008fe0af145d8.jpg

 

597665c176ab4_myrtle036.jpg.e889524a71bc7b632bd6f8f3ebbf794d.jpg

Link to comment
Share on other sites

heres a chatty oak, still cracks me up how they argue over t/r ratio theory.

 

natures rules!

 

[ATTACH]131909[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]131910[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]131911[/ATTACH]

 

[ATTACH]131912[/ATTACH]

 

I was chatting to an ex TO now tree surgeon and he said its funny as the way to TO's are taught is that all fungi growing on trees are bad and any cavity, no matter how big or small warrants the tree to be felled.

 

He thankfully has seen the light and now is saving more trees than felling. He saved a beech with G. lipense, it was a monster at the end of the garden and said to the land owner not to fell it but to just reduce the end weight off the lower hyper extended limbs. The tree is still going strong despite the 3ft deep cavity at the base.

Link to comment
Share on other sites

I was chatting to an ex TO now tree surgeon and he said its funny as the way to TO's are taught is that all fungi growing on trees are bad and any cavity, no matter how big or small warrants the tree to be felled.

 

He thankfully has seen the light and now is saving more trees than felling. He saved a beech with G. lipense, it was a monster at the end of the garden and said to the land owner not to fell it but to just reduce the end weight off the lower hyper extended limbs. The tree is still going strong despite the 3ft deep cavity at the base.

 

 

sounds like a tree that will need annual inspection

Link to comment
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
 Share


  •  

  • Featured Adverts

About

Arbtalk.co.uk is a hub for the arboriculture industry in the UK.  
If you're just starting out and you need business, equipment, tech or training support you're in the right place.  If you've done it, made it, got a van load of oily t-shirts and have decided to give something back by sharing your knowledge or wisdom,  then you're welcome too.
If you would like to contribute to making this industry more effective and safe then welcome.
Just like a living tree, it'll always be a work in progress.
Please have a look around, sign up, share and contribute the best you have.

See you inside.

The Arbtalk Team

Follow us

×
×
  • Create New...

Important Information

We have placed cookies on your device to help make this website better. You can adjust your cookie settings, otherwise we'll assume you're okay to continue.